Classification of Möbius Isoparametric Hypersurfaces in <img src="/fulltext-image.asp?format=htmlnonpaginated&src=D0U5276972225G48_html\605_2006_Article_420_TeX2GIFEqu1.gif" border="0" alt="${\Bbb S}^5$" />

Zejun Hu,Haizhong Li,Changping Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00605-006-0420-x
2007-01-01
Abstract:Let M-n be an immersed umbilic-free hypersurface in the (n + 1)-dimensional unit sphere Sn+1, then M-n is associated with a so-called Mobius metric g, a Mobius second fundamental form B and a Mobius form Phi which are invariants of M-n under the Mobius transformation group of Sn+1. A classical theorem of Mobius geometry states that M-n(n >= 3) is in fact characterized by g and B up to Mobius equivalence. A Mobius isoparametric hypersurface is defined by satisfying two conditions: (1) Phi 0; (2) All the eigenvalues of B with respect to g are constants. Note that Euclidean isoparametric hypersurfaces are automatically Mobius isoparametrics, whereas the latter are Dupin hypersurfaces. In this paper, we determine all Mobius isoparametric hypersurfaces in S-5 by proving the following classification theorem: If x : M -> S-5 is a Mobius isoparametric hypersurface, then x is Mobius equivalent to either (i) a hypersurface having parallel Mobius second fundamental form in S-5; or (ii) the pre-image of the stereographic projection of the cone in R-5 over the Cartan isoparametric hypersurface in S-4 with three distinct principal curvatures; or (iii) the Euclidean isoparametric hypersurface with four principal curvatures in S-5. The classification of hypersurfaces in Sn+1 (n >= 2) with parallel Mobius second fundamental form has been accomplished in our previous paper [7]. The present result is a counterpart of the classification for Dupin hypersurfaces in E 5 up to Lie equivalence obtained by R. Niebergall, T. Cecil and G. R. Jensen.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?