Rural Residential Land Transfer in China: Government-Driven or Market-Driven?
Zhibin Mo,Yuzhe Wu,Jianfeng Ye
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6190-5_113
2017-01-01
Abstract:In recent years, several modes of rural residential land transfer have emerged in the rapid urbanization of China, which could be categorized as government-driven mode and market-driven mode. This paper, firstly, reviews the development history and drawbacks of the current rural residential land system, then analyzes the feasibility of government-driven mode according to the current literature, lastly, propose a market-driven mode of rural residential land transfer, namely, the market-driven nationalization, of which the superiority and feasibility are verified based on the IAD framework. The results indicate that (1) the present rural residential system highly restricts the capitalization of rural residential land, which not only leads to the waste of land resource, but also infringes the benefits of rural residents, also hinders the progress of urbanization. (2) The capitalization of rural residential land will play a significant role in the urbanization of China, but the government-driven mode, including the complete nationalization and complete privatization of rural residential land, is infeasible according to the actual national condition. (3) The market-driven nationalization of rural residential land is more of feasibility in capitalizing the idle capital of rural residential land, narrowing the rural-urban economic gap, and furthering the development of China’s urbanization.