Difference of Neostigmine Antagonizing Vecuronium at Different Ages

龚蔚,沈浩,张晓庆
2008-01-01
Abstract:Objective To study the difference of Neostigmine antagonizing Vecuronium at different ages and discuss its possible reason.Methods Sixty patients scheduled for elective surgeries were divided into 4 groups by age,15 patients in each group.The patients aged 61~80 years were in group E_1 and E_2.The patients aged 40~60 years were in group Y_1 and Y_2.The patients in group E_1 and Y_1 received Neostigmine post-operation,while patients in group E_2 and Y_2 received no Neostigmine.Midazolam,Propofol,Fentanil and Vecuronium were used for anesthesia induction.Muscle relaxing monitor was used to measure T1 and TOFR.After surgery,Neostigmine 0.035 mg/kg and Atropine 0.01 mg/kg were administered when T1 was 10%.The tracheal catheter was extubated when TOFR returned to 75%.The time for T1 returning to 25%, 75%,90%,and the time of TOFR returning to 25%,75%,and recovery index(RI) were compared between groups individually.Results There was significant difference of T1 time returning to 25%,75%, 90%and time of TOFR returning to 25%,75%and RI both between group E_2 and E_2 and between group Y_1 and Y_2(P0.05).There was no significant difference of all these variables between group E_2 and Y_2(P0.05).Between group E_1 and Y_1,the time of T1returning to 25%,75%and time of TOFR returning to 25%and RI had no significant differences(P0.05),but the time of T1returning to 90%and time of TOFR returning to 75%had significant difference(P0.05).Conclusion Neostigmine can obviously shorten the recovery time of muscle relaxant.The recovery time of one dose of Vecuronium is not significantly different between different ages.The elders need more time in recovery while using Neostigmine on antagonizing muscle relaxant.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?