Abstract:BACKGROUND Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) for the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS) is used increasingly widely because it is a minimally invasive procedure. However, some clinical practitioners argued that EST may be complicated by post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatills (PEP) and accompanied by a higher recurrence of CBDS than open choledochotomy (OCT). Whether any differences in outcomes exist between these two approaches for treating CBDS has not been thoroughly elucidated to date. AIM To compare the outcomes of EST vs OCT for the management of CBDS and to clarify the risk factors associated with stone recurrence. METHODS Patients who underwent EST or OCT for CBDS between January 2010 and December 2012 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Follow-up data were obtained through telephone or by searching the medical records. Statistical analysis was carried out for 302 patients who had a follow-up period of at least 5 years or had a recurrence. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed to adjust for clinical differences. A logistic regression model was used to identify potential risk factors for recurrence, and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC curve was generated for qualifying independent risk factors. RESULTS In total, 302 patients undergoing successful EST (n =168) or OCT (n = 134) were enrolled in the study and were followed for a median of 6.3 years. After propensity score matching, 176 patients remained, and all covariates were balanced. EST was associated with significantly shorter time to relieving biliary obstruction, anesthetic duration, procedure time, and hospital stay than OCT (P < 0.001). The number of complete stone clearance sessions increased significantly in the EST group (P = 0.009). The overall incidence of complications and mortality did not differ significantly between the two groups. Recurrent CBDS occurred in 18.8% (33/176) of the patients overall, but no difference was found between the EST (20.5%,18/88) and OCT (17.0%, 15/88) groups. Factors associated with CBDS recurrence included common bile duct (CBD) diameter > 15 mm (OR = 2.72; 95%CI: 1.26-5.87; P = 0.011), multiple CBDS (OR = 5.09; 95%CI: 2.58-10.07; P < 0.001), and distal CBD angle 5145 degrees (OR = 2.92; 95%CI: 1.54-5.55; P = 0.001). The prediction model incorporating these factors demonstrated an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.81 (95%CI: 0.76-0.87). CONCLUSION EST is superior to OCT with regard to time to biliary obstruction relief, anesthetic duration, procedure time, and hospital stay and is not associated with an increased recurrence rate or mortality compared with OCT in the management of CBDS.

A Prospective Study of the Efficacy of Endoscopic Biliary Stenting on Common Bile Duct Stones

Clinical Value of Endoscopic Biliary Stent Placement for Bile Leakage Following Hepatobiliary Surgery

Feasibility of Using Endobiliary Stent for Laparoscopic Exploration of Common Bile Duct

Endoscopic biliary stenting for irretrievable common bile duct stones: Indications, advantages, disadvantages, and follow-up results

Additional endoscopic procedures instead of urgent surgery for retained common bile duct stones.

Endoscopic placement of biliary stent in treatment of malignant biliary obstruction

Efficacy of endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation for bile duct stones

Short-term and Long-Term Outcomes after Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Versus Endoscopic Papillary Balloon Dilation for Bile Duct Stones

Theraneutic Effects of Endoscopic Sphincterotomy and Endoscopic Papillary Balloon Dilation for Extrahepatic Bile Duct Stones

Treatment for Difficult Common Bile Duct Stones by Endoscopic Retrograde Biliary Plastic Stent Placement Drainage

Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Plastic Stent Coated with Stone-Dissolving Agents for the Treatment of Biliary Stones in a Porcine Model

Clinical research of biliary plastic stenting combined with ursodeoxycholic acid in elderly patients with unextractable common bile duct stones

Treatment of extrahepatic bile duct stones with laparoscope and endoscopes in 610 patients

Clinical Analysis of Endoscopic Sphincterotomy in Patients with Common Bile Duct Stone

Evaluation of effect of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and laparoscopic bile duct exploration lithotomy in treatment of intra/extra-hepatic duct stones

Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Associated Cholangitis in Patients Receiving Proximal Biliary Self-Expanding Metal Stents.

Clinical analysis of endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis

Clinical efficacy and safety of enteral extended biliary stent in treatment of biliary stricture

Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Combined with Large Balloon Dilation for Bile Duct Stones

Outcomes of endoscopic sphincterotomy open choledochotomy for common bile duct stones.

Clinical Efficacy of Suspended Overlength Biliary Stents Reformed from Nasobiliary Tubes for Prevention of Duodenobiliary Reflux( with Video)