Comparisons of Digestive Organs Development and Cecal Microflora between Pekin Duck and Maple Leaf Duck with Different Feed Conversion Efficiency

LIANG Heng-zhi,WANG Bo,YIN Da-fei,HOU Zhuo-cheng,YUAN Jian-min
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0258-7033.2013.19.011
2013-01-01
Abstract:A study was conducted to compare the relative weight of main digestive organs,the activities of amylase in the small intestinal contents and pancreas,and the cecal microflora between Pekin duck and Maple leaf duck with different feed conversion efficiency.One-day-old ducks of each breed(Pekin duck and Maple leaf duck) were fed on the same floor net pan from hatching to 21 d of age,and 8 ducks of each breed were slaughtered at 21d of age.At 42d,according to the results of the F/G ratio during 21 to 42 d of age,ducks in the two breeds were divided into three groups with high,medium and low feed to gain ratio,respectively.Ten ducks per group were slaughrered.The relative weight of main digestive organs and activities of amylase in pancreas as well as intestinal contents were measured,and the DNA from cecal content was extracted for PCR-DGGE analysis.The results showed that no marked differences of relative weight of digestive organs and activities of amylase between Pekin duck and Maple leaf duck was observed at 21d of age(P>0.05).There was great similarity of the cecal microflora between the two breeds.The relative weight of most of digestive organs was markedly higher in Pekin duck than those in Maple leaf duck at 42 d of age(P<0.05).However,the activities of amylase was significantly lower in Pekin duck than those in Maple leaf duck at 42 d of age(P<0.05).The relative weight of pancreas was significantly lower in low F/G ratio group than those in high and medium F/G ratio group(P<0.05).However,the activities of amylase in the pancreas were reversed at 42 d of age(P<0.05).There was low similarity of cecal microbial community between two breed at 42 d of age.Ducks of high and medium F/G ratio groups had similar compositions of cecal bacteria which was greatly different from that in duck of low F/G ratio.The results indicate that the bigger difference of FCR during the finisher period is due to increscent variations of activities of amylase and cecal microflora.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?