Treatment of traumatic atlantoaxial instability via posterior internal fixation and fusion plus atlantoaxial pedicle screw

王守国,徐用亿,谢跃,费昊东,季峰,赵庆华,田纪伟
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3977/j.issn.1005-8478.2011.16.04
2011-01-01
Abstract:[Objective]To study the therapeutic effect of posterior fixation and fusion plus pedicle screw in treatment of traumatic atlantoaxial instability.[Method]A retrospective analysis was done on twenty patients(14 male and 6 female,mean age of 39.6 years old)with traumatic atlantoaxial instability treated via atlantoaxial pedicle screw system from March 2008 to October 2010,included 4 cases with Jefferson fracture,5 cases with type-Ⅱ Dens fracture,3 cases with Dens fracture combined with atlantoaxial dislocation,1 case with Jefferson fracture combined with Dens fracture,7 cases with atlantoaxial dislocation.The post-operative effect was evaluated with JOA(Japanese Orthopaedic Association)scores and VAS(visual analogue scale).[Result]Operative time were 138.75±20.06 min,and blood loss were 338.80±100.10 ml.All patients received the follow-up(range from 12 to 25 months,mean 15.6 months).All atlantoaxial joint came to bony fusion by the last follow-up without complication due to instrumentation.There was significant difference on VAS scores between pre-operation(7.25±1.52) and post-operation(2.13±1.75)(P<0.01).There was significant difference on JOA scores between pre-operation(8.65±3.49) and post-operation(13.05±4.88)(P<0.01),and improvement rate was 58.01±20.15%.[Conclusion]Posterior fixation and fusion plus pedicle screw has the advantages of strong fixation,direct screw placement,and high fusion rate in traumatic atlantoaxial instability.So it is a better alternative for traumatic atlantoaxial instability.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?