Evaluation of Reliability and Validity for the Undergraduates Evaluate Classroom Teaching Form in School of Public Health, Peking University
Liu Xiaokang,Liu Xiaoyun,Cai Jingyi,Wang Haijun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677x.2016.03.040
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of undergraduate evaluate classroom teaching form.Methods A total of 85 students and 7 senior professors evaluated the performance of teaching for 11 teachers of three subjects in school of public health,Peking University.Factor analysis and correlation analysis were used to evaluate construct validity.Correlation analysis was used to evaluate criterion validity.Cronbach' s alpha were applied to test internal consistency.Results ①Structure validity:the evaluation form included four dimensions (teaching methods,teaching skills,innovation and practice and teaching contents),which explained 82.8 percent of the total variance.Spearman correlation coefficient ranged from 0.626 to 0.716 when paired comparison of the four dimensions.Spearman correlation coefficient between each factor and the total score ranged from 0.769 to 0.913.② Criterion validity:Pearson correlation coefficient between total scores evaluated by students and the total scores evaluated by professors was 0.817.The rank of total scores of 11 teachers evaluated by students was similar to the rank evaluated by professors.③Internal consistency:Cronbach's alpha coefficient for total scores was 0.931,and four dimensions were 0.751,0.808,0.929,0.824,respectively.Conclusions The structure validity,criterion validity and internal consistency of the form is good,which can provide a evidence for other colleges and universities to develop the evaluation methodology for students assessing the teaching.