PO-1032: Clinical Features and Treatment Outcome of Resectable Pulmonary Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma
J. Moon,W. H. Lee,B. M. Lee,J. Lee,A. J. Yang,G. Yang,J. Kim,T. H. Kim,N. Kim,H. I. Yoon,J. H. Cho,C. G. Lee,S. H. Choi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-8140(21)01049-5
2020-01-01
Abstract:Pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung that accounts for only 1% to 3% of all lung cancers and was re-classified as a distinct neuroendocrine group. There is an emerging need for an agreement on the best strategy for managing pulmonary LCNEC. Here, we reviewed our institutional experiences and tried to suggest the appropriate treatment directions for resectable pulmonary LCNEC. A total of 72 patients were pathologically diagnosed as pulmonary LCNEC between January 2005 and December 2018 in the Yonsei cancer center. We considered curative surgery first for patients with early-stage tumors or some advanced-stage tumors with resectable status, unless they were medically inoperable. Adjuvant treatment option was decided after considering each patient’s clinical and pathologic features. Consequently, 39 patients with stage I to III LCNEC (I: 18, II: 12, III: 9) underwent curative resection of the primary tumor, and these patients were included in this study cohort. In stage I, 6 (33%) patients received surgery alone, and 12 (67%) patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. In stage II, 2 (17%) patients received surgery alone and 10 (83%) patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. In stage III, only 1 (11%) patient received surgery alone, and 8 (89%) received adjuvant treatment, include 6 with adjuvant chemotherapy, 2 with sequential chemotherapy and radiotherapy (RT), and 1 with adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy. With a median follow-up of 30 months, the median overall survival (OS) was 58.8 months and 3-year, 5-year rates were 58% and 47%, respectively. The median recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 24 months and 3-, and 5-year rates were 47% and 39%, respectively. In the univariate analysis for OS, older age (≥67) and SCLC-mixed histology were poor prognostic factors (p = 0.019, p = 0.001 (vs. pure LCNEC), and 0.015 (vs. NSCLC-mixed)), respectively. These 2 factors were independently associated with OS also in multivariate analysis (p = 0.036, 0.003, and 0.015). SCLC-mixed histology was the only significant factor for poor RFS. In the entire cohort, recurrences occur in 17 patients (44%). Most of the recurrence patterns were very extensive even at first recurrence; 14 distant metastases (m/c, 82%), 8 local recurrences, and 8 regional (all mediastinal lymph node) recurrences. Our study demonstrated that surgery ± adjuvant treatment could achieve favorable survival outcomes in pulmonary LCNEC. Some factors such as older age and mixed histology with SCLC made the overall prognosis worse, regardless of the stage, which proposed the need for adjuvant treatment strategies by a multidisciplinary approach. More aggressive treatments than NSCLC as mediastinal RT for node-positive patients, new chemotherapy regimens, or prophylactic cranial irradiation could be considered. Further studies in a larger cohort would be needed to draw more definitive conclusions.