Division of Labor between Semantics and Phonology in Normal and Disordered Reading Development Across Languages
Jiafeng Yang,Bruce D. McCandliss,Hua Shu,Jason D. Zevin
2008-01-01
Abstract:Division of Labor between Semantics and Phonology in Normal and Disordered Reading Development across Languages Jianfeng Yang (jiy2002@med.cornell.edu) 1 Hua Shu (shuh@bnu.edu.cn) 2 Bruce D. McCandliss (bdm2001@med.cornell.edu) 1 Jason D. Zevin (jdz2001@med.cornell.edu) 1 Sackler Institute for Developmental Psychobiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, NY 10021, USA State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, CHINA mappings from spelling to sound are dominant, with multiple grain sizes, including single letters, cluster of letters corresponding to single phonemes (graphemes) and larger units (e.g., rimes) contributing to spelling-to-sound mappings, sometimes in conflicting ways. For Chinese characters, in contrast, the mapping from spelling to sound is syllable-based, such that the pronunciation of a whole character is probabilistically determined by its phonetic component. This difference in grain size drives a difference in the degree of arbitrariness between the two writing systems: In English spelling, even a very strange word such as YACHT has some predictability (i.e. the Y, A, and T is assigned pronunciations common in other contexts). In Chinese, however, the space of possible pronunciations given an unfamiliar character is unconstrained. Differences in the statistical regularity of writing systems have important consequences for the development of reading skill. One is a marked difference in speed of learning to read across languages: There is strong evidence that learning to read a regular alphabetic orthography is easier than learning to read irregular orthographies (Seymour, Aro, & Erskine, 2003). The average English child can read 3000-5000 words after first grade (White, Grave& Slater, 1990) whereas Chinese children after first grade can typically read only 667 characters (Xing, Shu, Li, 2004). A second consequence of orthographic depth on reading development concerns the division of labor between direct- and semantically-mediated spelling-to-sound (Harm & Seidenberg, 2004), i.e., the differential impact of semantics on word reading across writing systems. In a “shallow” orthography, pronunciations can easily be computed directly from spelling, resulting in a relatively limited role for semantics in reading aloud (Raman & Baluch, 2001). In relatively “deep” languages, such as English, semantic knowledge plays a role, particularly in the reading of words whose spellings are highly atypical (Strain, Patterson, & Seidenberg, 1995). Because Chinese is deeper still than English, the role of semantic processing in reading aloud is greater and much more widespread, with the result that the contribution of semantics to the development of Chinese reading is particularly important. Over the course of development, this difference in the division of labor means that distinct pre-literate language skills will contribute differentially to reading success across writing systems. The relative contribution of “phonological awareness” -- i.e., the ability to categorize and manipulate Abstract In order to study how statistical patterns in different languages can shape the division of labor in the reading system, we trained two models with the same basic architecture and learning parameters: One was trained to read Chinese, the other English. In Simulation 1, we examined the role of semantics in the early development of reading by comparing results from training with and without input from semantics. Semantic input had relatively modest effects for learning to read English, mainly improving performance on exception words. In Chinese, the influence of semantics was much greater and much more widespread: all types of words were learned more quickly, although the benefit was still greater for words with atypical spelling-to-sound correspondences. In Simulation 2, we simulate the effect of developmental deficits in phonological and semantic processing on the development of reading. Consistent with data concerning individual differences in reading skill, phonological deficits had a much greater impact on English, whereas semantic deficits had a more serious impact on learning to read Chinese. The results demonstrate that differences in the division of labor among readers of different writing systems can be explained in terms of the statistical properties of the writing systems and their interaction with generic associative learning mechanisms. Keywords: modeling Reading; development; computational In previous studies, we have examined how a modeling framework developed to explain a variety of phenomena in the translation from spelling to sound in English could be extended to explain similar phenomena in Chinese. Those studies demonstrated that the same basic architecture and learning rules appropriate to English could model the acquisition and use of reading skill in Chinese, and simulate both effects that are directly analogous to English (consistency) and effects that are specific to Chinese (phonetic radical regularity) (Yang, Zevin, Shu, McCandliss& Li, 2006). In the current study, we pursue this further by asking whether two models with the same functional architecture (aside from language-specific orthographic and phonological representations) can capture differences between the two languages in the division of labor between direct and semantically-mediated translation from spelling to sound. Chinese and English differ in the relative statistical regularity of spelling-to-sound mappings. The distinction comprises differences in both the grain size (Ziegler & Goswami, 2006) and degree of arbitrariness of mappings between the writing systems. In English, sub-syllabic