Abstract:Quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC) methods are playing an increasingly important role in the pricing of complex financial derivatives. For models in which the prices of the underlying assets are driven by Brownian motions, the performance of QMC methods is known to depend crucially on the construction of Brownian motions. This paper focuses on the impact of various constructions. Although the Brownian bridge (BB) construction often yields very good results, as Papageorgiou pointed out, there are financial derivatives for which the BB construction performs badly [Papageorgiou, A. 2002. The Brownian bridge does not offer a consistent advantage in quasi-Monte Carlo integration. J. Complexity18(1) 171--186]. In this paper we first extend Papageorgiou's analysis to establish an equivalence principle: if the BB construction (or any other construction) is the preferred construction for a particular financial derivative, then for any other construction, there is another financial derivative for which the latter construction is the preferred one. In this sense, all methods of construction are equivalent and no method is consistently superior to others; it all depends on the particular financial derivative. We then show how to find a good construction for a particular class of financial derivatives. In practice, our strategy is to find a good construction for an “easy” problem and then apply it to more complicated problems related to the easy one. This strategy is applied to the arithmetic Asian options (including Bermudan Asian options) based on the weighted average of the stock prices. We do this by studying a simpler problem, namely, the geometric Asian option, for which the best construction is easily available, and applying it to the arithmetic Asian option. Numerical experiments confirm the success of this strategy: whereas in QMC all the common methods (the standard method, BB, and principal component analysis) may lose their power in some situations, the new method behaves very well in all cases. Further large variance reduction can be achieved in combination with a control variate. The new method can be interpreted as a practical way of reducing the effective dimension for some class of functions.

MARKOVIAN QUADRATIC TERM STRUCTURE MODELS FOR RISK-FREE AND DEFAULTABLE RATES

Quadratic Term Structure Models for Risk-Free and Defaultable Rates

Finite-Time Ruin Probabilities For The Two-Dimensional Compound Binomial Model In Markovian Environment

Bidimensional Discrete-Time Risk Model with Constant Interest

Credit Risk Modeling and the Term Structure of Credit Spreads

Evaluating the Default Risk of Bond Portfolios with Extreme Value Theory

Dynamic Term Structure Modelling with Default and Mortality Risk: New Results on Existence and Monotonicity

Four-factor model of Quanto CDS with jumps-at-default and stochastic recovery

A Parsimonious Multivariate Markov Chain Model for Credit Risk

Pricing and Hedging in Affine Models with Possibility of Default

General dynamic term structures under default risk

qGaussian model of default

Good Path Generation Methods in Quasi-Monte Carlo for Pricing Financial Derivatives.

Specification analysis of structural credit risk models

Rational Multi-Curve Models with Counterparty-Risk Valuation Adjustments

A Gaussian Affine Term Structure Model of Interest Rates and Credit Spreads

A Consistent Stochastic Model of the Term Structure of Interest Rates for Multiple Tenors

Why are quadratic normal volatility models analytically tractable?

Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods in Financial Engineering: An Equivalence Principle and Dimension Reduction

Robust Bernoulli mixture models for credit portfolio risk