Imaging Findings and Comparative Study of Gastrointestinal Schwannomas and Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors on Helical CT

邢伟,谭华桥,俞胜男,吴小凤,孙益芳,邱建国
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-9324.2006.06.012
2006-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate CT findings of gastrointestinal schwannomas, and compare these findings with those of gastrointestinal stromal tumors(GIST).Materials and Methods 12 cases of gastrointestinal schwannomas and 34 gastrointestinal stromal tumors(10 benign and 24 malignant) proven surgically and pathologically were included. The clinical features and CT findings of both with regard to the size, contour, margin, growth type, contrast enhancement pattern, contrast enhanced degree,presence or absence of ulcer were retrospectively reviewed and the latter were compared by two experienced radiologists。The statistical significance was evaluated by using 95% confidence interval,one-way ANOVA, q test and chi square test.Results The diameter of benign GISTs were significantly smaller than that of gastrointestinal schwannomas and malignant GIST (mean±SD, 3.6± 1.27, 6.0±2.49, 7.8±3.56, respectively) (P0.05). The contour was round or oval in most of both gastrointestinal schwannomas and benign GISTs (83.3% and 80%, respectively), but lobulated in malignant GISTs (84%). There was significant difference in shape between gastrointestinal schwannomas and GISTs. Growth types in schwannomas and GISTs were diverse as endoluminal, exogastric, or both, with no statistical difference (P0.05). There was significant difference in model and extent of enhancement between gastrointestinal schwannomas, benign GISTs and malignant GISTs (P0.05). Ulcer in malignant GISTs (28%)was more common than that in gastrointestinal schwannomas,(25%), benign GISTs (20%), but without statistical difference (P 0.05). Conclusion Most gastrointestinal schwannomas are appeared as round, and homogeneous solid tumors with slight or nonenhancement on CT, these CT findings are very similar to those of benign GISTs, but distinguishable from those of malignant GISTs.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?