Abstract:Remote sensing images have found numerous applications nowadays. A traditional outcome or intermediate result of their processing is a classification map. Such maps are usually obtained from a pre-trained classifier and it is desired to have the produced classification maps as accurately as possible. The basic subject of this article is the factors determining this accuracy. The main among them are the quality of remote sensing data and classifier type, parameters and training approach. Image quality can be degraded due to several factors. One of them is distortions introduced by lossy compression that is widely used due to a huge volume of acquired data and the necessity to sufficiently decrease their size at transmission, storage and/or dissemination stages. Because of this, the main goal of this paper is to consider classification and lossy compression jointly. In particular, this means that the classifier learning can be performed for original (uncompressed, compressed in a lossless manner) images (if they are available) as well as for compressed data at hand (offered to a user for classification and further analysis). The task of this paper is to consider and compare these two options. The first one is the classifier learning for original images and further application to compressed data, where images can be compressed with different compression ratios while producing compressed data of different quality. The second option is the use of the classifier learning for compressed images, where compression parameters for training data can be approximately the same as for the images to which the classifier is applied. The main result is that the latter methodology can provide certain benefits compared to the classifier learning for original data if one has to classify compressed remote sensing data. Simulation data are obtained for a classifier based on a convolutional neural network. As images for training and verification, four real-life three-channel (visible range) Sentinel-2 remote sensing images of Kharkiv and Kharkiv region are employed that possess different complexity of the content and have four main classes. The practical recommendations are given. In conclusion, we can state that it is worth having classifiers trained for several degrees of compression and it is reasonable to compress complex structure images with special care.

Classification under Data Contamination with Application to Remote Sensing Image Mis-registration

Spatial classification in the presence of measurement error

A New Robust Approach for Remote Sensing Image Regional Classification

Misclassification in Weakly Supervised Object Detection

Improved Robust Kernel Subspace for Object-Based Registration and Change Detection

Online Classification Of Contaminants Based On Multi-Classification Support Vector Machine Using Conventional Water Quality Sensors

A review of addressing class noise problems of remote sensing classification

Factors Affecting Spatial Variation of Classification Uncertainty in an Image Object-based Vegetation Mapping

An Online Contaminant Classification Method Based on MF-DCCA Using Conventional Water Quality Indicators

Data Contamination Can Cross Language Barriers

Contaminant Classification Using Cosine Distances Based on Multiple Conventional Sensors.

The Classification of Noise-Afflicted Remotely Sensed Data Using Three Machine-Learning Techniques: Effect of Different Levels and Types of Noise on Accuracy

Error-Tolerant Deep Learning for Remote Sensing Image Scene Classification

Human-annotated label noise and their impact on ConvNets for remote sensing image scene classification

Learning to Classify With Possible Sensor Failures

Anisotropic Diffusion Probabilistic Model for Imbalanced Image Classification

Information Leakage in Deep Learning-Based Hyperspectral Image Classification: A Survey

On classifier learning methodologies with application to compressed remote sensing images

Effects of Image Degradation and Degradation Removal to CNN-Based Image Classification

Effects of Image Degradations to CNN-based Image Classification

Impact of Inaccurate Contamination Ratio on Robust Unsupervised Anomaly Detection