Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To assess the correlations between objective measurements of 108 finished orthodontic cases and subjective assessments made by 69 orthodontic specialists, to explore the statistically significant measuring categories of cast and cephalogram and to validate the regression model.METHODS:A stratified random sample of 108 cases was drawn from the large sample of 2 383 patients who finished orthodontic treatment between July 2006 and August 2008 in six orthodontic treatment centers around China. For each patient, the post-treatment information sources evaluated in this study included standardized plaster study casts and a lateral cephalometric X-ray image. These information sources were evaluated both singly and in combination by a panel of 69 orthodontic specialists. The average subjective grading scores of 69 orthodontists were regarded as the gold standard. Six examiners used the peer assessment rating (PAR) index and American board of orthodontics-objective grading system (ABO-OGS) to measure all the study casts respectively and three other examiners measured all the lateral cephalometric X-ray images by using customized software. The objective measuring data were correlated with the gold standard. The correlations between the objective measurement and the subjective evaluation were assessed, the statistically significant measuring categories of cast and cephalogram were explored and the regression model was validated.RESULTS:The ABO-OGS scores of "occlusal relationship" correlated most strongly with the subjective scores of cast (r=0.655, P<0.01), and the secondarily correlated category with those were the PAR scores of "overjet" (r=0.525, P<0.01). The proclination of the lower incisors correlated most strongly with the subjective scores of cephalogram (r=0.446, P<0.01), and the secondarily correlated category with those was the protrusion of the lower lips (r=0.436, P<0.01). Nine components were predictive for the post-treatment model and lateral ephalometric film (Post-M+C) outcome: alignment (ABO-OGS), occlusal relationship (ABO-OGS), interproximal contact(ABO-OGS), L1/NB°, overjet (PAR), SNB°, occlusal contacts (ABO-OGS), U1/SN2° and centerline (PAR). These 9 components accounted for 72% of the variability in the average subjective grading scores.CONCLUSION:The objective regression model could replace the averaged opinion of Chinese orthodontic experts effectively, making objective assessment of orthodontic treatment outcome for Chinese patients.

Research of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Complexity, Outcome and Need

Evaluation and Comparative Assessment of Clear Aligners and Conventional Appliances on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Pediatric Populations: a Cross-Sectional Study.

Clinical Efficacy of Counterclockwise Rotating the Functional Occlusal Plane Using Micro-Implant Anchorage.

Initial development of an ‘Orthodontic Care Index’ involving treatment need,—complexity and—priority

The Improvement and Completion of Outcome index: A new assessment system for quality of orthodontic treatment

Reliability Assessment and Correlation Analysis of Evaluating Orthodontic Treatment Outcome in Chinese Patients

Comparison of orthodontic treatment need and malocclusion prevalence according to KIG, ICON, and mIOTN in German 8- to 9-year-old children of the Sixth German Oral Health Study (DMS 6)

Subjective and Objective Analysis of Orthodontic Expert Consensus on the Assessment of Orthodontic Treatment Outcomes.

Evaluating malocclusion patterns in children with autism spectrum disorder using the index of complexity, outcome and need: a cross-sectional study

Evaluation of degree of complexity, treatment need and outcome in a cohort- A retrospective study

Research on Chinese orthodontic specialists' subjective evaluation of orthodontic treatment outcome]

[Validation of Subjective and Objective Evaluation Methods for Orthodontic Treatment Outcome].

An objective system for appraising clear aligner treatment difficulty: clear aligner treatment complexity assessment tool (CAT–CAT)

Validity of the American Board of Orthodontics Discrepancy Index and the Peer Assessment Rating Index for Comprehensive Evaluation of Malocclusion Severity

Validation of the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System for Assessing the Treatment Outcomes of Chinese Patients

DF3 expression in human gallbladder carcinoma: significance for lymphatic invasion.

Interpreting Weightings of the Peer Assessment Rating Index and the Discrepancy Index Across Contexts on Chinese Patients.

The preliminary study on the evaluation of the orthodontic treatment result

Study on decision-making for orthodontic treatment plans based on analytic hierarchy process

[Evidence-Based Quality Assessment of 10-Year Orthodontic Clinical Trials in 4 Major Dental Journals].

An innovative evaluation method for clinical comparative analysis of occlusal contact regions obtained via intraoral scanning and conventional impression procedures: a clinical trial