Abstract:This study was undertaken to systematically examine factors affecting the nuclear transfer of buffalo somatic cells,so as to establish a preliminary procedure for buffalo cloning.Buffalo oocytes obtained from ovaries at slaughter were matured in vitro for 22-24 h and then enucleated in manipulation medium containing 5 μg/mL cytochalasin B.Fibroblasts and cumulus cells after 3-9 passages in DMEM+10% FBS were treated by serum starvation(0.5% FBS for 2-9 days),0.1 μg/mL aphidicolin(APD) for 1 day and 0.5% FBS for 2-9 days or continue culturing in 10% FBS for 2-9 days,then,were transferred into enucleated oocytes by microinjection or electronic fusion(100 V/mm,15 μs and 3 pulses).The reconstructed embryos were activated by exposuring them to 5 μmol/L ionomycin for 5 min and then culturing in 2 mmol/L 6-DAMP for 3 h.After activation,embryos were cultured in 30 μL drop of granulosa cell monolayers for 8-10 days,to evaluate their cleavage and embryonic development.The cleavage rate of embryos reconstructed with fibroblasts and cumulus cells pretreated with 0.1 μg/mL APD+0.5% FBS were significantly higher than that of serum starvation group and control group(P0.01),however there was no significant difference in the percentage of cleaved oocytes developing to blastocysts among the 3 groups.There was not significantly difference in the cleavage rate and embryonic development among embryos derived from fibroblasts and cumulus cells pretreated with 0.1 μg/mL APD+0.5% FBS(63.06% vs 58.70%,P0.05).The cleavage rate of embryos reconstructed with cumulus cells by ellectrofusion was significantly higher than that by microinjection(P0.05),but no difference was found in their proportion developing to blastocysts.Sixty-five percent to 85% of cumulus cells at 3 and 6 passages,and fibroblasts at 6 and 10 passages had normal karyotype,which did not show significant difference among them(P0.05).When cumulus cells at G_3,G_4,G_5 and G_6 of passages were used as donor cells,the cleavage rate and blastocyst rate was similar,moreover,fibroblast cells at G_6,G_7,G_8 and G_9 of passages also resulted in a similar cleavage rate and blastocyst development.These results indicate that:(1)Fibroblasts and cumulus cells can be cultured up to 9 passages and keep relatively stable karyotepe;(2)Using 0.1 μg/mL APD to treat donor cells prior to nuclear transfer can improve the efficiency of somatic cell nuclear transfer in buffalo but serum starvation is inefficient in our system;(3)Both of fibroblast and cumulus cells can be used as the donor karyoplasts for nuclear transfer,and their efficiency are not influenced by the culture passages;(5)The development of reconstructed embryos by electrofusion is higher than that by microinjection,but there is no difference in the total efficiency between the two methods.

Effects of Buffalo Somatic Cell Serial Nuclear Transfer

Comparison of Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer of Buffalo and the Effects of Time Interval Before Activation on Nuclear Transfer by Whole-Cell Intracytoplasmic Microinjection

Effects of Different Source of Donor Cells on Buffalo Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer

Studies on somatic cell nuclear transfer in buffalo

Studies on the Methods of Buffalo Somatic Cells Nuclear Transfer

Primary Study on Buffalo Somatic Cell Reverse Nuclear Transfer

Studies on the Nuclear Transfer of Buffalo Somatic Cells

Effect of Sex Differences in Donor Foetal Fibroblast on the Early Development and DNA Methylation Status of Buffalo (bubalus Bubalis) Nuclear Transfer Embryos.

Development of Buffalo Nuclear Transfer Embryos Derived from Donors Cultured in Different Ways

Effect of Donor Cell Treatment on Development of Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer Embryos in Buffalo

Effect of the cytochalasin B on the development of buffalo somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos

Development of embryos reconstructed by interspecies nuclear transfer of adult fibroblasts between buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) and cattle (Bos indicus).

Effects of Donor Cell Categories on the Development of Buffalo Embryos Derived from Nuclear Transfer

Treatment of donor cells with trichostatin A improves in vitro development and reprogramming of buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) nucleus transfer embryos

Improved Efficiency of Bovine Cloning by Autologous Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer.

Comparative transcriptome profile of embryos at different developmental stages derived from somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) and in-vitro fertilization (IVF) in riverine buffalo (Bubalus bubalis)

Buffalos (Bubalus bubalis) cloned by nuclear transfer of somatic cells.

An Inter-Subspecies Cloned Buffalo (bubalus Bubalis) Obtained by Transferring of Cryopreserved Embryos Via Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer

A Comparison of in Vitro Development of Buffalo (bubalus Bubalis) Embryos Produced Either by Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer or in Vitro Fertilization Using Oocytes Obtained by Different Methods.

Somatic Cell Bovine Cloning: Effect of Donor Cell and Recipients