Abstract:Human-autonomy collaboration plays a pivotal role in the development of Maritime autonomous surface ships (MASS), as Shore control center (SCC) operators may engage in the control loop by directly operating the MASS, or, in the supervisory loop, monitoring the MASS and taking over control when needed. Thus, efficient human performance during takeover control and operation is crucial for the safety of MASS operations. However, since the MASS is still in the early phase of development, the mechanism of human errors is unknown, and the data on human-autonomy collaborative operation is scarce. Human reliability analysis (HRA) aims to assess human errors qualitatively and quantitatively, and is widely used in various complex systems to help safety analysis. This study is dedicated to incorporating advanced HRA methods elements to identify and quantify human errors during taking over control and operation of a MASS in collision avoidance scenarios. It presents virtual experimental results, combined with theoretical human error identification and assessment methods. At first, we apply the Human-System Interaction in Autonomy (H-SIA) method to identify potential human errors; secondly, we identify relevant Performance Shaping Factors (PSFs) including Experience, Boredom, Task complexity, Available time and Pre-warning, and performance measures of the human errors, and implement them in the virtual experiment based on a full-scale autonomous ferry research vessel called milliAmpere2. Finally, we build a Bayesian Network (BN) to present causal and probabilistic relationships between PSFs and human errors through experimental data. The results show that available time has the highest impact on takeover performance of operators, followed by task complexity and pre-warning. Boredom does not present a significant sole impact unless combined with available time. Experience does not show a significant impact on human performance. In addition to the relevance of the human errors analysis to the safe development and operational design of MASS, the developed method benefits other human-autonomy collaborative systems. The developed BN model shows adaptability to assess human error probabilities, and the practical significance of integrating experimental data into the existing HRA methodologies for complex systems.

Human Error Analysis Supported by Behavior Modes

Analysis of Human Error Modes and Causal Factors

The Method of Human Error Analysis for Complicated Man-Machine System

A New Analytical Method on Network Information Security——Human Error Analysis

A Review of Cognitive Models in Human Reliability Analysis

C-HFAMF: A New Way to Accident Analysis Considering Human Factor

Error Analysis of Digital Systems Operator Cognitive Behavior under Stressful Conditions

A System Dynamics Model of Prevention through Design towards Eliminating Human Error

Development of Data-Driven Influence Model to Relate the Workplace Environment to Human Error

Human Reliability Method Analysis Based on Human Error Correcting Ability

Analysis of Human Error in Network Information Security

The Mechanism of How Design Failures Cause Unsafe Behavior: the Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method (Cream)

Study on Human Error and Causal Factors

Preventable Medical Errors Driven Modeling of Medical Best Practice Guidance Systems

Analysis of interrelationships of human errors using linguistic decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory with consensus reaching process

Identifying Effective Management Factors Across Human Errors – A Case in Elevator Installation

Using Human Intellectual Tasks As Guidelines to Systematically Model Medical Cyber-Physical Systems.

A data-driven Bayesian network of management and organizational factors for human reliability analysis in the process industry

Human Error Risk Management Methodology for Rail Crack Incidents

Analysis of human errors in Human-autonomy collaboration in autonomous ships operations through shore control experimental data

Grey Relativity Analysis of Human Error Causal Factors