Ambidextrous Leadership and Employee Voice Behavior: The Role of Work Motivation and Ambidextrous Culture
Chenhui Ouyang,Yongyue Zhu,Zhiqiang Ma
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S385033
IF: 3.974
2022-10-07
Psychology Research and Behavior Management
Abstract:Chenhui Ouyang, Yongyue Zhu, Zhiqiang Ma School of Management, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, People's Republic of China Correspondence: Yongyue Zhu, School of Management, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, People's Republic of China, Tel +86 13914553150, Email Purpose: In the current competitive environment of increased uncertainty and instability, it is of significance to promote employee voice behavior. To discuss the issue of how to promote employee voice behavior both effectively and reasonably, this study focuses on ambidextrous leadership, which consists of two seemingly opposite yet potentially complementary behaviors—transformational and transactional leadership—and investigates its influence mechanism on employees' voice behavior, using work motivation as a mediator and ambidextrous culture as a moderator. Methods: Enterprise employees and their direct supervisors from 78 work teams in China were surveyed, and 387 sets of paired data were analyzed using data analysis software, such as HLM, SPSS, and AMOS. Results: The results reveal that ambidextrous leadership can significantly positively predict employee voice behavior. Employee work motivation plays a partial mediating role in the positive correlation between ambidextrous leadership and voice behavior. Additionally, organizational ambidextrous culture positively moderates the correlation between ambidextrous leadership and the work motivation of employees. The greater the ambidextrous culture of teams is, the stronger the positive correlation between ambidextrous leadership and the work motivation of employees. Conclusion: Leadership plays an important role in promoting employee voice behavior. Therefore, understanding how ambidextrous leadership style can effectively promote voice behavior is important for companies to utilize the power of their employees to respond quickly to change and drive innovative transformation. This study contributes to existing research by revealing how ambidextrous leadership impact employee voice behavior through work motivation, which provides new evidence for the emerging ambidextrous leadership theory and helps to understand the relationship between employee work motivation and voice behavior more comprehensively; it also identifies organizational ambidextrous culture as organizational context factor which moderate the effect of ambidextrous leadership on work motivation. Keywords: ambidextrous leadership, employee voice behavior, work motivation, organizational ambidextrous culture With the advent of the VUCA (volatility, uncertainty, complexity, ambiguity) era, technologies and markets change rapidly, and enterprise competition is becoming increasingly fierce. Managers may not be able to fully grasp all the information and problems present in their business process or operation; 1 this has caused the concept of employee voice behavior, which can gather employees' wisdom power and realize information intake from multiple channels, to receive increasing attention. 2 In order to build sustainable competitive advantage, organizations need to make full use of the strengths of employees and actively encourage employees to implement voice behaviors that are useful to organizational development. 3,4 However, contrary to this objective expectation, employees often choose to remain silent at work because of psychological risks, resource pressure, personal gains and losses. 5 Especially in China, where traditional concepts such as "silence is golden" have been passed down for a long time, employees generally associate staying silent with virtues such as modesty, steadiness and respect for others. 6 Therefore, in the Chinese organizational context, how to effectively and reasonably motivate employees to implement voice behavior is an important issue that needs to be explored. The conclusion that leadership is the key factor that influences employees' voice behavior has been confirmed by a large number of empirical studies, which have explored the relationship between many specific single leadership styles, such as paternalistic leadership, inclusive leadership and authentic leadership, and employees' voice behavior. 7–9 However, to date, only a few studies have linked such leadership related factors as "ambidextrous" and "paradoxical" with employee voice behavior, 10–12 and the research conclusions are not comprehensive or rich. The continuous emergence of the management paradox makes it difficult to meet the needs of realizing multiple management goals with a single leadership mode that follows the logical thinking of "either/or". 13–15 Moreover, in the face of complex management practices, it may be difficult for managers to consistently implement a particula -Abstract Truncated-
psychology, clinical, multidisciplinary