Abstract:Project 211 is one of the most important educational policies in China, which aims at selecting a small number of “key universities” for sustainable development in the 21st century. These selected “key universities” have received substantial funding from the government so they can recruit outstanding faculty and be equipped with high quality facilities. Although this national policy has come into being for more than a decade, limited empirical studies have been conducted to examine how the policy influences students’ performance as well as whether the policy is perceived to interfere with test fairness. Using differential item analysis (DIF) and content analysis, this study examined the effect of group membership (key vs. non-key universities) on one of the large-scale high-stakes language tests–the Graduate School Entrance English Examination (GSEEE). The results identified a number of DIF/DBF, all favoring test takers from key universities. A review of the flagged items by three test reviewers found a myriad of potential factors including unbalanced learning opportunities, which may contribute to performance differences between two groups. However, none of the reviewers deemed that unbalanced educational opportunities brought bias and presented a threat to fairness. Fairness in this context is conceptualized to require individuals or groups who are less well-off to sacrifice social benefits and resources to those who are better off to achieve the overarching aim of maximizing economic benefit to the society.

A Multivariate Generalizability Study on the History Test of College Entrance Examination

The Combination of Fairness and Science in the Reform of College Entrance Examination

On the Nature and Phenomena of College Entrance Exmination Competition

Where Should the Reform of the New National College Entrance Mathematics Subject Examination Go:From no Distinction to a Little Distinction Between Arts and Sciences

Retrospect and Prospect of University Entrance Examination

A Motivation Perspective on College Admission Reform in Shanghai: The Effect of Providing More Choices and Multiple Evaluation Criteria

The Trains of Thought,Principles and Policy Suggestions about University Entrance Exam Reform

An Incident and a Revolution——on Provincial Implementation of College Entrance Exams

Test Fairness: Examining Differential Functioning of the Reading Comprehension Section of the GSEEE in China

The Effect of a National Education Policy on Language Test Performance: a Fairness Perspective

Reflections on the History of the Reform of College Entrance Examination

Do college entrance examination admission characteristics influence students’ college satisfaction? Evidence from China

The Study of Imperial Examination and the Reform of College Entrance Examination

ANALYSIS OF THE INFLUENCING FACTORS AFFECTING STUDENTS' COLLEGE ENTRANCE EXAMINATION SCORES

Investigating the Reliability of CET6 Essay Scoring:An Application of Generalizability Theory and Many-facet Rasch Model

The Application Research of Using Multivariate Generalizability Theory to Assess the Clinical Skill of Internal Medicine

Do College Entrance Examination Scores Predict Undergraduate GPAs? A Tale of Two Universities

Analysis of Influencing Factors on the Chinese Achievement Test in the College Entrance Examination: A Hierarchical Linear Model

Investigating Score Dependability in English/Chinese Interpreter Certification Performance Testing: A Generalizability Theory Approach

The Impact of Family Background on Subject Selection in Senior Secondary School Students in the Context of the Reform of College Entrance Examination: An Empirical Study Based on Survey Data from Zhejiang Province

A Study of the Fairness and Effectiveness of Evaluation by National Student Physical Health Standard——Based on Inspirations from American High Stakes Test Items