Abstract:This paper studies axioms for nonmonotonic consequences from a semantics-based point of view, focusing on a class of mathematical structures for reasoning about partial information without a predefined syntax/logic. This structure is called a default structure. We study axioms for the nonmonotonic consequence relation derived from extensions as in Reiter's default logic, using skeptical reasoning, but extensions are now used for the construction of possible worlds in a default information structure. In previous work we showed that skeptical reasoning arising from default-extensions obeys a well-behaved set of axioms including the axiom of cautious cut. We show here that, remarkably, the converse is also true: any consequence relation obeying this set of axioms can be represented as one constructed from skeptical reasoning. We provide representation theorems to relate axioms for nonmonotonic consequence relation and properties about extensions, and provide one-to-one correspondence between nonmonotonic systems which satisfies the law of cautious monotony and default structures with unique extensions. Our results give a theoretical justification for a set of basic rules governing the update of nonmonotonic knowledge bases, demonstrating the derivation of them from the more concrete and primitive construction of extensions. It is also striking to note that proofs of the representation theorems show that only shallow extensions are necessary, in the sense that the number of iterations needed to achieve an extension is at most three. All of these developments are made possible by taking a more liberal view of consistency: consistency is a user defined predicate, satisfying some basic properties.

Handling Contradictions In Default Theories

A fault-tolerant default logic

A Coherent and Paraconsistent Variant of the Default Logic.

Axiomatic Aspects of Default Inference

Four-Valued semantics for default logic

Restricted Semantics for Default Reasoning.

Iterated Revision In Default Logic

Restricted Four-Valued Logic for Default Reasoning.

A logic for default reasoning

Going Forth and Drawing Back: an Intensional Approach in Nonmonotonic Inference.

A Base Logic for Default Reasoning

Problems of Inconsistency and Argumentation Logics

A Prioritized Default Extension to Description Logic Knowledge Base

Towards Solving the Multiple Extension Problem: Combining Defaults and Probabilities

Complexity of Prioritized Default Logics

Where Fail-Safe Default Logics Fail

Impossible and Conflicting Obligations in Justification Logic

Multi-Definitions of "Contradiction" and Theoretical Dilemma of Dialestheism

An Argumentation-Based Approach To Handling Inconsistencies In Dl-Lite

A Tableau Algorithm For Paraconsistent And Nonmonotonic Reasoning In Description Logic-Based System

On Establishing Robust Consistency in Answer Set Programs