Abstract:Abstract Introduction Radical prostatectomy remains one of the gold standard treatments for localized prostate cancer, the most prevalent solid organ cancer in men. Surgical management of prostate cancer has been theorized to increase the risk of developing Peyronie’s Disease (PD). In 2010, Drs. Tal and Mulhall’s team characterized the incidence of PD in a cohort of 1011 men after radical prostatectomy to be 13.7% at 2 years and 15.9% at 3 years of follow-up. These numbers, significantly higher than estimates in the general population, which range from 0.5 to 7.1% (Sharma et al., Sex Med Rev 2020;8:314–23), suggest radical prostatectomy is a risk factor for developing PD. Objective Our aim was to evaluate the incidence of PD among post-prostatectomy patients who undergo a formal multi-modal penile rehabilitation program that includes mechanical and pharmacologic interventions to promote penile smooth muscle activation after surgery. Methods In this retrospective, descriptive study we reviewed the charts of 581 patients who were diagnosed with prostate cancer, treated with robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP), and were engaged in a penile rehabilitation program from January 2016 through January 2019. At our institution, patients scheduled for prostatectomy are referred preoperatively to an academic Men’s Health clinic to start a multi-modal program and follow up regularly for evaluation of sexual health. The program includes daily tadalafil, L-citrulline, and VED use (Table 1). Patients refractory to these therapies had the option to increase tadalafil dosing or undergo further treatment with intracavernosal injections at ~3 months post-op. We excluded patients who had PD pre-operatively or who did not have post-operative follow-up with the providers at this institution. The primary outcome of interest was the incidence of PD among this cohort. Secondary outcome included time to development or diagnosis of PD. Results 581 patients with prostate cancer treated with RALP engaged in penile rehabilitation and were included in this analysis. The median age of men was 62.6 y with additional demographics listed in Table 2. The incidence of PD in this cohort was 2.9% (17 patients) with a median follow-up of 21.4 mo (IQR 2.8 – 55.8 mo). The diagnosis of PD was made at a median of 28.7 mo (IQR 20 – 36 mo) after prostatectomy. The 17 patients with PD had a median follow-up of 38.9 mo (IQR 23.2 – 55.8 mo). Conclusions In this cohort of prostate cancer patients treated with RALP and undergoing a consistent, multi-modal penile rehabilitation program, the incidence of PD was 2.9%, and median time to diagnosis was 28.7 months. This is the first study to assess PD incidence in men who engage in mechanical and pharmacologic penile rehabilitation at time of RALP. Furthermore, diagnosis of PD was made more than two years after surgery; this warrants further evaluation on whether penile rehabilitation prevents PD. This retrospective analysis is a hypothesis-generating study that should inspire further research on the role of regular mechanical stimulation or daily PDE-5 inhibitors in delaying or preventing PD after pelvic surgery. Disclosure Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Endo Scientific.

Prevention and management of erectile dysfunction after laproscopic radical prostatectomy]

Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy (with a Report of 53 Cases)

[Penile Rehabilitation after Radical Pelvic Surgery].

Analysis of the predicting factors for erectile function recovery after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

An update on the current status and future prospects of erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy

(333) Sexual Function Recovery Following Open And Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Results Of An Academic Penile Rehabilitation Program

AB032. Penile rehabilitation using Vacuum Erection Device for erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy

Penile Rehabilitation with Vacuum Erection Device for Erectile Dysfunction after Radical Prostatectomy

Amnesia for Object Attributes

Management of erectile dysfunction following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review

Factors Influencing Urinary Continence after Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

Management of Post-RALP SUI and ED - What are and What Should we be Doing?

Screening of Associated Factors for Erectile Dysfunction after Radical Prostatectomy and Construction of a Clinical Risk Assessment Model: A Retrospective Study

Improve Recovery of Urinary Continence Following Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: a Clinical Report of 51 Cases

(012) Incidence of Peyronie’s Disease After Radical Prostatectomy Among Patients Undergoing Penile Rehabilitation Regimen

Penile Rehabilitation after Radical Prostatectomy: Patients' Attitude and Feasibility in China.

[Changes in the Penis Size of Prostate Cancer Patients after Radical Prostatectomy and Its Influencing Factors].

Restoring Quality of Life: A Comprehensive Review of Penile Rehabilitation Techniques Following Prostate Surgery

(013) How do Sexual Medicine Specialists Handle Patient Counseling and Penile Rehabilitation in Patients Undergoing Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (ralp): Trends in Pre Op and Post Operative Management

Evaluation of vascular changes in cavernous arteries by penile doppler ultrasound in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

Current Management of Post-radical Prostatectomy Urinary Incontinence