ROC Analysis of CT Hemodynamics in the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer
ZHANG Jing,WANG Peijun,YUAN Xiaodong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-9324.2008.02.013
2008-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of CT perfusion in breast cancer by clinical epidemiological method of ROC(receiver operating characteristic curve)analysis. Materials and Method 81 cases with breast mass found by health examination or mammography received MSCT(multislice spiral CT) perfusion, then hemodynamic parameters (blood flow,BF; mean transit time, MTT; blood volume, BV) were calculated by deconvolution arithmetic. According to the pathologic results, two groups of benign and malignant were classified, Statistical test was performed between them. Then ROC character of BF, MTT, BV was compared, and the diagnostic value of the hemodynamic parameters were confirmed. Result In the malignant group, BF was (0.735±0.440) ml·min-1·ml-1, MTT was (22.771±7.647)s, and BV was 0.234±0.082. While in the benign group, the BF was (0.466±0.527)ml·min-1·ml-1, MTT was (26.712±12.934)s, and BV was 0.179±0.117.As for BF and BV, there was significant difference between the two groups. When the hemodynamic parameters were used to discriminate the breast lesions, area under the ROC curve(AUCROC)value of BF was 0.832±0.086, it was the maximum. AUCROC value of BV was 0.695±0.092, there was no significant difference between them. AUCROC value of MTT was 0.473±0.102, it was minimum; as the threshold of BF was 0.381 ml·min-1·ml-1, the sensitivity was 82.3%, the specificity was 73.2%, the positive likelihood ratio was 3.071, the negative likelihood ratio was 0.242; as the threshold of BV was 0.190, the sensitivity was 73.3%, the specificity was 56.5%, the positive likelihood ratio was 1.685, the negative likelihood ratio was 0.473. Conclusion CT hemodynamic parameters (BF and BV) have certain diagnostic value in breast cancer, but BF or BV can not be single index to confirm or deny the diagnosis of breast cancer.