Reparation of Sulfonated Chitosan and Its Ability to Protect Bfgf Activites

Xing-jie Wu,Lie Ma,Chang-you Gao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1105.2012.11230
2012-01-01
Acta Polymerica Sinica
Abstract:Three kinds of sulfonated chitosans, e. 3,6-O-sulfonated chitosan (OCS),2-N-sulfonated chitosan (NCS) and 2-N-sulfopropyl chitosan (PCS) were synthesized. Their chemical structures were verified by FTIR and H-1-NMR. The sulfonation degree of the sulfonated chitosan, which was determined by elemental analysis, could be varied by changing the amount of sulfonation reagent or the reaction time. To evaluate the growth factor-protective ability of sulfonated chitosans, basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), which is one of the most important growth factors in tissue repair, was used as the target protein. By in vitro cell culture, the morphology of fibroblasts cultured in different conditions was observed by the costaining of cytoskeleton and cell nuclei, according to which the cell shape indexes such as perimeter, area and aspect ratio were analyzed. The results showed that bFGF/Heparin has the highest values in all cell shape indexes. However, compared to the pristine chitosan (CS), the combination of bFGF with all sulfonated chitosan did not show any effect on the fibroblasts morphology. By cell viability test, the influence of sulfonated chitosan on protecting bFGF activity was studied. Similar to the results of cell morphology, heparin also showed the strongest ability to promote bFGF activity. However, the sulfonated chitosans showed different protecting ability. For OCS and PCS, no significantly effect on bFGF activity was observed. However, NCS could promote the bFGF activity effectively, since the cell viability was significantly higher than that of bFGF/CS,and reached about 70% of bFGF/Hep. Meanwhile, the effect of sulfonation degree was also studied, showing that the cell viability was not affected by the sulfonation degree of chitosan. All these results indicate that the sulfonation position is the key point of the growth factor-protective ability of sulfonated chitosans.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?