Market Incompleteness, Innovation, and Reform: Commentary on Adam Przeworski's Article

Zhiyuan Cui
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/003232929101900104
1991-01-01
Politics & Society
Abstract:of history,&dquo; &dquo;the grand failure,&dquo; and &dquo;the irrelevance of socialist idea.&dquo; In contrast to these black and white judgments, Przeworski paints a more complicated picture. We are told: &dquo;The socialist critique of the irrationality of capitalism is valid but the socialist alternative is infeasible.&dquo; (p. 24) For me, Przeworski’s paper is a call to thinking more deeply about the nature of the great change that we are now experiencing. In this commentary, I will further elaborate on, and give more substance to, the conclusion about &dquo;the irrationality of capitalism and the infeasibility of socialism.&dquo; I try to define precisely the sources of &dquo;the irrationality of capitalism&dquo; and where &dquo;the infeasibility of socialism&dquo; lies. I shall also make some comments on the different strategies for reforming socialism. These comments form a theme that follows naturally from Przeworski’s conclusion about socialism’s infeasibility. Throughout my discussion, I define the notions of &dquo;capitalism&dquo; and &dquo;socialism&dquo; as Przeworski
What problem does this paper attempt to address?