Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation(pci)in Patients with Small Cell Lung Cancer(sclc)in Complete Remission: a Systematic Review

WANG Daoying,TIAN Jinhui,YANG Kehu,ZHANG Qiuning,LI Zheng,WANG Xiaohu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-4992.2012.02.28
2012-01-01
Journal of Modern Oncology
Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the clinical value and optimal therapeutic dose of prophylactic cranial irradiation(PCI)in patients with small cell lung cancer(SCLC)in complete remission.Methods: We searched PubMed,EMBASE,Cochrane Library,Chinese Biomedical Literature Database,China Journal Full Text Database,and Wanfang Database.All the relevant randomized controlled trials was collected,and the quality of the included trials was assessed.Meta-analyses were conducted by RevMan 5.0 software.Results: Fifteen studies were involved and 2233 patients were included.Meta-analysis showed that : there was significant difference in 1-,2-,3-,5-year survival rates),OR= 1.77,95%CI(1.33-2.35),OR= 1.57,95%CI(1.09-2.25)],disease-free survival rate)],brain metastases rate 0.19-0.46)],other transfer rate between PCI group and no-PCI group.But there was no significant difference in local recurrence rate between PCI group and no-PCI group.To compared with higher-dose group,the standard-dose group can increase 1-year overall survival and 1-year disease-free survival,and 2-year overall survival,3-year overall survival,2-year disease-free survival,3-year disease-free survival had no difference between standard-dose group and high-dose group,but 1-year brain metastases rate was higher than high-dose group.Conclusion: PCI can improve the overall survival rate and disease-free survival rate,at the same time,reduce brain metastases and other transfer rate in patients with small cell lung cancer.So it can be used as a kind of small cell lung cancer prevention and treatment method.The high-dose PCI group did not significantly reduce the total brain metastases and mortality rate,so we think 25Gy PCI still should be standard treatment dose for SCLC.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?