Tatbestand:Reversion and Redefinition of the Core Concept of System on Crime
Chen Xingliang
2011-01-01
Abstract:Tatbestand is the logical start and core concept of the theoretical system on crime. This paper explores the conceptual history of the theory of Tatbestand, in which it confirms Beling's historical contributions and points out three characteristics of his theory of Tatbestand, i. e. , the guiding function of Tatbestand, which provides objective contour for the crime, the type characteristic of Tatbestand, which to a large extent determines the types of crimes, and the objective nature of Tatbestand. Although the theory of Tatbestand has experienced great changes since Beling, the most important historical stage for this theory was the period from Beling to Feuer-bach, and its following development has taken the conception established by Beling as a logical start. However, Soviet scholars transformed Tatbestand into the constitutive elements of a crime, thus transformed Tatbestand from the premise of a crime into the sum of the constitutive elements of a crime, which has eradicated the influence of the Tatbestand. Therefore, the four—element system on crime is a theory without Tatbestand. Since the early stage when China introduced the four—element system on crime from Soviet Union, Chinese scholars continued the misunderstanding of the concept of Tatbestand, looking Tatbestand as the general conditions for the constitution of a crime, which has led Chinese theory of crime to a completely different way from the three—stage system on crime. The introduction of Beling's the theory of Tatbestand, especially the introduction of the three—stage system on crime, domesticated as the theory of definition, the theory of conduct and the theory of actus rea by some Chinese scholars, makes it possible to make an objective comparison between the fourelement system on crime and the three—stage system on crime and provides another possibility for the development of criminal theory in China.