Effectiveness of Air Purifier Intervention in Beijing - A Panel Study
Danqing Shao,Yipeng Du,Bert Brunekreef,Kees Meliefste,Qian Zhao,Xiaoming Song,Jie Chen,Meng Wang,Juan Wang,Xian Wang,Bei He,Wei Huang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1289/isee.2015.2015-7549
2015-01-01
Abstract:Objective: This study aimed to assess the impact of air filtration on indoor air quality and cardio-pulmonary health in residents living in high outdoor pollution settings in Beijing. Methods: Twenty homes of COPD patients and their partners in Beijing were recruited to participate in this study, between December 2013 to March 2014. Air filtration units were operated randomly in sham-mode and in active- mode for two weeks in each home. Indoor and outdoor PM2.5 and indoor black carbon were measured concurrently. Participants were repeatedly measured for pulmonary function (FEV1, FEV1% predicted, FEV1/FVC%, MMEF, MMEF% predicted), respiratory inflammation (EBC pH, 8- iso, nitrite, the sum of nitrite and nitrate), systemic inflammation (CRP, Fib, IL-6 and -8) and oxidative stress (urinary 8-OHdG), and autonomic and vascular functions (HF, LF, SDNN, SBP and DBP) at baseline and at the end of each filtration mode period for a total of three times. Results: In this experiment, active-mode air filtration reduced indoor PM2.5 by 57%, ranged between 31-69%. In COPD patients only, there was some indication of a beneficial effect on respiratory airway inflammation reduction with an increase of 0.3 in EBC pH (S.E. 0.14), comparing to that measured after air filtration in sham-mode. The increases in respiratory and systemic inflammation (EBC nitrite, the sum of nitrite and nitrate, and IL-8) are found significantly associated with PM2.5 exposure on lag 3 and 4 days. Conclusion: Air filtration reduced the indoor PM2.5 and BC concentrations significantly. No clear health benefits could be demonstrated in this study