Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate and determine clinical outcomes and survival rates of straight and extended length subcrestal angulated (ELSA) implants (20–24 mm lengths) placed for immediate (up to 72 h post‐operative) or delayed rehabilitation (4 months post‐operative) of severely atrophic maxillae. Prosthetic treatment consisted of interim and definitive implant‐supported fixed implant‐supported prostheses with up to 3 years of function. Materials and Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted of 38 patients (five dropped out; final total was 33), treated between 2017 and 2019 in a private practice. Extended length subcrestal angulated (ELSA) implants and conventional endosseous straight implants (Southern Implants, Irene, South Africa) with (fixed) full arch prostheses were used to restore patients with edentulous maxillae immediately (within 72 hs) or delayed (4 months). ELSA implants have subcrestal angulations of 24° and 36° of the restorative platforms, external hexagon crestal anti‐rotation abutment connections, and lengths between 18 and 26 mm. Implant loading was determined by implant insertion torque values (as determined on the surgical units); 120 Ncm was the threshold level for immediate loading. Clinical and radiographic examinations were done that recorded the clinical outcomes of implants and prostheses. SPSS was used to process the data. Results Thirty‐three patients and 187 implants were included with follow‐up periods of at least 12 months (range 12–36 months). The mean age of the study population was 62.6 ± 8.4 years old (at the time of implant placement). Thirty‐three patients (86.8%) were followed for 12 months; 13 patients (39.4%) were followed for 24–35 months; 9 patients (27.3%) were followed for 36 months. In total, 13 implants in six patients failed secondary to sinus infections. Mean bone levels (MBLs) were respectively: 0.88 ± 2.12 mm at loading, –1.53 ± 2.03 mm at 12 months, –2.26 ± 1.45 mm at 24 months, and –2.54 ± 1.46 mm at 36 months. The ELSA implants showed significantly lower (p = 0.014) MBL at 36 months than did the conventional implants. One hundred thirty‐seven implants were placed and loaded within 72 h; 50 implants were placed and loaded 4 months post placement. The combined implant survival rates were 93.0% at 12 months, 91.1% at 24 months, and 100% at 36 months. The ELSA implants showed significantly lower (p = 0.014) MBLs at 36 months when compared to the conventional implants. Conclusions The results of this retrospective clinical chart review indicated that the use of ELSA implants placed into anterior maxillae and nasal crests with accentuated distal tilts (>30°) and simultaneous sinus augmentation provided favorable outcomes for prosthetic rehabilitation in patients with severe atrophic maxillae. ELSA implants placed with simultaneous sinus augmentation are an alternative option to zygomatic implants (ZI) when immediate loading is prescribed. Sinus infections were thought to be the proximate causes of all implant failures. Further long‐term clinical studies are warranted with larger patient populations.

Early Loading of ITI Implants Supporting Maxillary Fixed Full-Arch Prostheses.

Early Loading of Dental Implants Supporting Mandibular Fixed Full-Arch Prostheses

[Comparison of the Stability Between Early-Loaded and Conventionally-Loaded ITI Implants].

Early Loading of Splinted Implants in Posterior Mandible: Three-year Results of a Prospective Multicenter Study

Long-Term Outcomes of Early Loading of Straumann Implant-Supported Fixed Segmented Bridgeworks in Edentulous Maxillae: A 10-Year Prospective Study

[Stability of Implants Placed in Different Bone Types].

A CBCT study of changes in temporomandibular joint morphology with immediate implant placement and immediate loaded full-arch fixed dental prostheses

A prospective, multi-center study assessing early loading with short implants in posterior regions. A 3-year post-loading follow-up study.

Immediate occlusal loading of immediately placed implants supporting restorations in completely edentulous arches:a short-term pilot study

Immediate Loading of Dental Implants in Partialful Edentulous and Edentulous Jaws

Immediate Loading Using the Digitalized Customized Restoration of Single-tooth Implants Placed in Fresh Extraction Sockets in the Aesthetic Anterior Maxilla: A 10-Year Prospective Study of Marginal Bone Level

Resonance Frequency Analysis of Stability on ITI Implants with Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation Technique Without Grafting: a 5-Month Prospective Study.

Early Loading of Splinted Implants in the Posterior Mandible: a Prospective Multicentre Case Series.

On the role of number of fixtures, surgical technique and timing of loading

Full arch immediate occlusal loading using site specific implants: A clinical series of 10 patients (13 arches)

Immediate versus early loading of immediately placed bone‐level tapered dental implants with hydrophilic surface in full arch maxillary rehabilitation: A pilot randomized clinical trial with 2‐year follow‐up

Time Efficiency of Immediate Loading of Full-arch Implant Reconstructions Using Prefabricated Prostheses Located by an Anchor Pin: a Pilot Study.

Immediate loading of four freestanding implants retaining a mandibular overdenture: 3-5 years follow-up study

Immediate rehabilitation of severely atrophic maxillae using conventional and extended length subcrestal angulated (ELSA) implants: A retrospective analysis of 187 implants in 33 patients with up to three years of function

[Implanting the Edentulous Jaws with "All-on-4" Immediate Reconstruction: a Preliminary Clinical Observation].

Immediate occlusal loading of full-arch rehabilitations: screw-retained versus cement-retained prosthesis. An 8-year clinical evaluation