Impact of 1q21 Amplification on Prognosis of Multiple Myeloma Treated with Bortezomib or Thalidomide

ZENG Tianmei,YE Fei,ZHANG Chunyang,FU Weijun,LI Lu,ZHOU Fan,HOU Jian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2013.06.004
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective To analyze the correlation between the 1q21 amplification and the treatment response in patients with multiple myeloma treated with Bortezomib and/or Thalidomide.Methods Fluorescence in situ hybridization(FISH) was used to detect the 1q21 amplification in patients treated with Bortezomib and/or Thalidomide.The clinical characteristics and treatment response were also analyzed.Results Results 1q21amplification was discovered in 29 of 108 patients(26.9%).The patients with 1q21 amplification had a higher median age and lower HB concentration than those without 1q21 amplification(62y vs.58y,P=0.029 and 81.39 g/L vs.97.58 g/L,P=0.002).Other clinical characteristics such as SCr,Ca2+,ALB,β2 microglobulin,plasma cell proportion seemed to have no correlation with 1q21 amplification.The patients with 1q21 amplification had a higher rate of IgH translocation and 13q deletion(79.3% vs.48.1%,P=0.004 and 58.6% vs.31.6%,P=0.011,respectively).The treatment response was evaluable in 95 patients.The overall response rate(ORR) was 73.7%(70/95).Twelve patients treated with both Bortezomib and Thalidomide were excluded and the remained 83 patients were divided into two groups(Bortezomib-based and Thalidomide-based).Response rate was not significant difference between patients with and without 1q21 amplification in Bortezomib-based group,but patients with 1q21 amplification had a higher response rate than those without 1q21 amplification in Thalidomide-based group(70% vs.80%,P=0.789 and 20% vs.78.3% P=0.005).Multivariate analysis showed 1q21 amplification was an independent prognostic predictor,OR(Odds Ratio)=0.231(95% CI:0.078-0.684,P=0.008).Conclusion 1q21 amplification was a vital predictor of prognosis as patients with 1q21 amplification had a lower response rate when treated with Thalidomide rather than Bortezomib.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?