Clinical evaluation of photodynamic therapy in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer

SHENG Wenwei,SONG Xiaodong,YE Zhangqun,YANG Weimin,CHEN Zhong,YUAN Xiaoyi,ZHAN Ying
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2012.09.003
2012-01-01
Journal of Clinical Urology
Abstract:Objective:Evaluate the effect of photodynamic therapy(PDT) which aims to prevent the recurrence and progression of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer after Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor(TURBT),and compare the difference between two generation photosensitizers. Methods:138 patients were selected into the experimental group who were diagnosed as non-muscle invasive bladder cancer by using cystoscopy and biopsy in our hospital from June 2005 to April 2011.Group A had 47 patients who used hematoporphyrin as photosensitizer before August 2007.Group B consisted of 91 patients who were used 5-Aminolaevulinic Acid(5-ALA) as photosensitizer after August 2007.The controlled group(106 patients) were received the conventional treatment.Both of the patients in Experimental group and Controlled group were administered an immediate intravesical pharmacotherapy within 24h after TURBT.And Experimental group were performed PDT within one week after TURBT.After administration of photosensitizer,Group A was performed PDTs in 36h and 60h.Then they were given the intravenous drip photosensitizer 100mg at 72h after first administration.12 hours later,Group A was performed PDT for the third time.Each time it lasted 20min.Group B did not have PDT until they had administration of 5-ALA before 2h.Group B performed PDT only once,which lasted 60min.Experimental group received the whole bladder irradiation,using semiconductor laser at wavelength of 630nm,with a power density of 50mW/cm2 approximately.After discharged,all the patients were routinely received intravesical pharmacotherapy for one year. Results:In experimental group,the total rate of tumor recurrence was 33.3%(46/138),among which it showed that the rates of tumor recurrence in Group A and B respectively were 31.9%(15/47) and 34.1%(31/91).There were 15 patients who progressed to muscle invasive bladder cancer accounting for the 10.9%(15/138) of experimental group.Group A was 10.6%(5/47) and group B was 11.0%(10/91).In controlled group,The rates of tumor recurrence and progression were 49.1%(52/106)and 24.5%(26/106).The results showed that the patie-nts in experimental group had less rates of tumor recurrence and progression than the controlled group(P<0.05).Either group A or B had less rates of tumor recurrence and progression than the controlled group(P<0.05).But there was no significant difference of the tumor recurrent rate and progressive rate between group A and B(P>0.05). Conclusions:On the basis of traditional treatment,the new treatment which combines with PDT may have the positive effect on decreasing the rates of tumor recurrence and progression of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.But the effects of treatment don't show much significant difference between two generation photosensitizers.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?