Review & meta-analysis: isopropanolic black cohosh extract iCR for menopausal symptoms – an update on the evidence
C Castelo-Branco,M Gambacciani,A Cano,M J Minkin,D Rachoń,X Ruan,A-M Beer,J Schnitker,H-H Henneicke-von Zepelin,S Pickartz,C. Castelo-Branco,M. Gambacciani,A. Cano,M. J. Minkin,D. Rachoń,X. Ruan,A.-M. Beer,J. Schnitker,H.-H. Henneicke-von Zepelin,S. Pickartz
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13697137.2020.1820477
2020-10-06
Climacteric
Abstract:<span>A systematic literature search revealed 35 clinical studies and one meta-analysis comprising 43,759 women, of which 13,096 were treated with isopropanolic <i>Cimicifuga racemosa</i> extract (iCR). Compared to placebo, iCR was significantly superior for treating neurovegetative and psychological menopausal symptoms, with a standardized mean difference of −0.694 in favor of iCR (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). Effect sizes were larger when higher dosages of iCR as monotherapy or in combination with St. John's wort (<i>Hypericum perforatum</i> [HP]) were given (−1.020 and −0.999, respectively), suggesting a dose-dependency. For psychological symptoms, the iCR+HP combination was superior to iCR monotherapy. Efficacy of iCR was comparable to low-dose transdermal estradiol or tibolone. Yet, due to its better tolerability, iCR had a significantly better benefit–risk profile than tibolone. Treatment with iCR/iCR+HP was well tolerated with few minor adverse events, with a frequency comparable to placebo. The clinical data did not reveal any evidence of hepatotoxicity. Hormone levels remained unchanged and estrogen-sensitive tissues (e.g. breast, endometrium) were unaffected by iCR treatment. As benefits clearly outweigh risks, iCR/iCR+HP should be recommended as an evidence-based treatment option for natural climacteric symptoms. With its good safety profile in general and at estrogen-sensitive organs, iCR as a non-hormonal herbal therapy can also be used in patients with hormone-dependent diseases who suffer from iatrogenic climacteric symptoms.</span>
obstetrics & gynecology