Abstract:Background: Varicosis is a common venous condition, which is typically treated surgically. However, selection of the optimal surgical approach can be challenging. Previous studies comparing endovenous laser treatment (EVLT) and conventional surgery were retrospective and observational in nature and the results may therefore have been influenced by selection bias and the presence of other confounding factors. In this study, we used propensity score matching to reduce selection bias when comparing EVLT and conventional surgery for the treatment of varicose great saphenous veins. Aim: To compare the perioperative and postoperative outcomes of EVLT and conventional surgery in patients with great saphenous vein varicosis. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 1063 patients treated for primary varicosis of the great saphenous vein at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University between January 2009 and December 2019. Among them, 56 patients were excluded owing to additional small saphenous varicose vein involvement, 81 owing to recurring varicose veins, 83 owing to complicated varicose veins (CEAP clinical classification C5-C6), and 6 owing to perioperative phlebitis. Finally, 772 patients were enrolled in this study. Standard demographic and clinicopathological data were collected from the medical records of the patients. For propensity score matching, 522 patients (261 who underwent EVLT and 261 who underwent conventional surgery) were randomly matched 1:1 by age, sex, onset time, smoking status, presence of diabetes, family history, stress therapy, C class, and the affected leg. Results: Of the 772 patients included in the study, 467 underwent EVLT and 305 underwent conventional surgery. There were significant differences in age, onset time, smoking and diabetes status, and family history between the two groups. Following propensity score matching, no significant differences in patients' characteristics remained between the two groups. ELVT was associated with a shorter operation time and hospital stay than conventional surgery, both before and after propensity score matching. There were no differences in complications between the two groups after propensity score matching. Patients who underwent EVLT had a higher recurrence rate during the two-year follow-up period than those who underwent conventional surgery (33.33% vs 21.46%, χ2 = 11.506, P = 0.001), and a greater percentage of patients who underwent EVLT experienced pain one week after the procedure (39.85% vs 19.54%, P = 0.000). Conclusion: EVLT may not always be the best option for the treatment of great saphenous vein varicosis.

Comparison of histological alteration between endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting and conventional vein saphenous harvesting

Endoscopy vs.Interrupted Incisions for Saphenous Vein Harvest in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft

Endoscopic greater saphenous vein harvesting during coronary artery bypass operation: Report of 136 cases

A histology and immunochemistry study comparing open versus close and open-method endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting

[Mid-Term Outcome of Endoscopic Greater Saphenous Vein Harvesting in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting].

A Comprehensive Clinical Outcome Analysis of Endoscopic Vessel Harvesting for Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

Comparison of Success Rate and Complications of Totally Percutaneous Decannulation in Patients with Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Postoperative Recovery Between Two Open Heart Surgeries:Minimally Invasive Right Subaxillary Vertical Thoracomy and Traditional Median Sternotomy

Saphenous vein harvesting techniques for coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Towards Endoscopic No-Touch Saphenous Vein Graft Harvesting in Coronary Bypass Surgery

Comparison of Modified Above-Knee and Conventional Surgery with the Stripping of the Great Saphenous Vein of Varicose Veins of the Lower Extremities: A Retrospective Study

Prospective randomized study comparing the Teleflex Medical SaphLITE Retractor to the Ethicon CardioVations Clearglide Endoscopic System

The Controversy of Using Insufficient Great Saphenous Veins in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Comparative Morphological Analysis of Healthy and Insufficient Veins Related to the Possibility of Using Them as a Graft

Correlations between ultrasound, tomographic, and intraoperative measurements of the great saphenous vein used as an arterial graft

Endovenous Laser Treatment and Conventional Surgery in Varicose Veins of Lower Limbs:A Clinical ;Study

Preserving Endothelial Integrity in Human Saphenous Veins during Preparation for Coronary Bypass Surgery

Biomechanics and Mechanobiology of Saphenous Vein Grafts

Long-term outcomes of great saphenous vein harvest techniques for infrainguinal arterial bypass in a Medicare-matched registry database

Endovenous laser treatment vs conventional surgery for great saphenous vein varicosities: A propensity score matching analysis

A Comparison of Postoperative Morphometric and Hemodynamic Changes Between Saphenous Vein and Left Internal Mammary Artery Grafts

Rationale and Design of a Multicenter Randomized Trial to Compare the Graft Patency Between No-Touch Vein Harvesting Technique and Conventional Approach in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery