Abstract:Three strictly comparable cross-section household dataset,related to 1988,1995 and 2001,are used to analyze the rapid yet unequal growth of wage and the sharp widening of wage structure.Earnings functions are compared and the increase in both the level and the inequality of wages are decomposed into their constituent elements.Distinctions are made between the variables likely to represent human capital,discrimination,and segmentation.The evidence suggests that productive characteristics were increasingly rewarded as marketization The Gini coefficient of earnings rose by 10.7 percentage points in the first phase from 1988 to 1995.Whereas the mean wage increased by 67 percent,the pay of the 10th percentile rose by only 22 percent,and that of the 90th percentile rose by 97 percent.These changes are much larger than those of the second phase from 1995 to 2001.Moreover,the returns to education rose sharply,as did the returns to occupation-specific skills.The initially slight inverse-U shape of the age-earnings profile became more pronounced: a change consistent with human capital theory.Thus the productive characteristics of workers were increasingly rewarded in the labor market.However,there were also signs of greater wage discrimination against women.Moreover,the market forces operating in the growing private sector and the relative immunity of the state sector from those forces generated greater wage segmentation among types of ownership,and provincial differences in the pace of reform and in economic growth created spatial segmentation in wages that could not be removed by the equilibrating movement of labor.Decomposition analyses were conducted in order to examine the contribution of particular characteristics to the rise in the Gini coefficient.Only a third of earnings inequality and its increase could be explained: the unobserved determinants are clearly important to the increase in earnings dispersion.The discrimination variables accounted for only a small part of the increase.The segmentation variables made the most important contribution,and that was mainly due to growing wage dispersion among provinces.This result is supported by other evidence of powerful divergence in mean earnings among provinces(Knight,Li and Zhao,2001).Some but not all components of human capital were disequalizing.These particular changes are likely to represent the stirring of labor market forces.

High Incomes In Monopoly Industries: A Discussion

Are the High Salaries of Employees in Monopoly Industries Justified?

An Analysis of the Issue of Inter-Industry Income Inequality in China

Decomposition Analysis on Income Inequality in Urban China

The Wage Gap Between State And Private Enterprises In China: Counterfactual Analysis Based On Quantile Regression

Administrative Monopoly,Technological Progress and the Industry Income Gap-based on the industrial panel data

Inter-Industry Inequality: An Important Source Of The Urban Income Gap- Regression-Based Decomposition

Rising Wage Inequality:Composition Effect and Price Effect

International Factor Mobility, Monopolistic Competition, and Wage Inequality

Marketization and Unequal Growth of Wage: Their Extent and Influence Factors

Measure and Decomposing Analysis of China's Industry Wage Gap

The Human Capital, the Characteristics and the Inequality in Income of Industries

Exponential Structure of Income Inequality: Evidence from 67 Countries

The Study of the Rural-urban Income Inequality a View from Residents' Income Resource

Inter-Industry Wage Differentials: an Increasingly Important Contributor to Urban China Income Inequality

The Status, Reason and Solution to Industry Income Gaps of China

The Effect Of Monopoly Power In Land Market On Housing Price

Intellectual Monopoly and Income Inequality in the United States, 1948–2021: A Long-Run Analysis

Income Inequality in Today’s China

Methods Of Measuring And Decomposing The Income Gap: A Survey

Monopolistic Competition When Income Matters