State-owned Controlling,Institutional Investors and Real Earnings Management
LI Zeng-Fu,LIN Sheng-Tian,LIAN Yu-Jun
2013-01-01
Abstract:State-owned controlling and institutional ownership are important factors of corporate governance in China.Earnings management is an important manifestation of governance effect.Therefore,studying the relations among state-owned controlling,institutional investors,and earnings management is meaningful.The early literatures of earnings management on state-owned controlling and institutional investors are based on accruals earnings management.However,in recent years,many scholars find that firms tend to implement real earnings management.Do state-owned controlling and institutional ownership also affect real earnings management behavior? No evidence is available to answer the research question. This paper’s theoretical contribution is a new theoretical and empirical research development of real earnings management.The level of real earnings management is characterized by abnormal net cash flow from operations,abnormal production costs and discretionary expenses.In this paper,the models proposed by Barth,et al.(2008) and Cohen et al.(2008) are basic models.The samples are from 4,953 companies in 10 industries from the years 2006 to 2009.From the perspective of real earnings management,this paper studies the governance effect of state-owned controlling and that of institutional investors,as well as different effects of institutional investors in state-owned firms and in non-stated firms. Finally,this study reveals that compared with private enterprises state-owned enterprises are more inclined to choose real earnings management for earnings manipulation.While the increase in the proportion of institutional ownership is in favor of inhibiting real earnings management of the enterprises,state-owned controlling enterprises will restrict the governance role of institutional ownership on real earnings management.In another word,with the increase in the proportion of institutional ownership the level of real earnings management in non-stated firms decreases more significantly than that in state-owned firms. From the perspective of real earnings management,state-owned controlling is not conducive to corporate governance.Institutional investors can improve corporate governance,but their roles are limited in state-owned firms.The conclusions of this study have both theoretical and practical significance.The findings of this study provide supplement to the existing study on the governance role of state-owned controlling.In practice,real earnings management activities would damage a company’s long-term interests.Thus,we should actively push state-owned enterprises’ reforms,such as pursuing equity reform,vigorously developing institutional investors,inhibiting the real earnings management,and improving corporate governance of state-owned enterprises.