R&D Disclosure,Managerial Incentives and Market Recognition:Evidences from Listed IT Companies in Mainland China

Zhao Wuyang,Chen Chao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2011.04.012
2011-01-01
Abstract:R&D provides companies a driving force to gain com-petitive advantages,and R&D disclosure is an important channel for the market to perceive a firm's R&D activities and assess its future growth in both product market and capital market.Since the top management has the discretionary power on R&D disclosures(including whether to and how to disclose its R&D investment),we wonder which kind of R&D disclosure will have the highest market recognition.Thus,this paper attempts to answer the above question by examining the impact of three types of R&D disclosure(development expenditures,the board of directors' report,or the footnote of cash flow statement;DE,DR and CF for short,respectively) on both product and capital markets.Collecting data manually from the annual reports of listed IT companies in Mainland China in 2001-2009,we compare the value relevance in the capital market among these three kinds of R&D disclosure and the financial performance based on product market between those companies with and without R&D disclosure.Our empirical results support the hypotheses based on managerial incentives.Specifically,among these three,R&D disclosure in the directors' report has the highest market recognition,because it cannot be used as an approach of earnings management while it can signal managerial emphasis as well as confidence on R&D.R&D disclosure in the footnote of cash flow statement can neither be used for earnings manipulation,nor be used to signal managerial confidence of firm's R&D activities.Therefore,the R&D disclosure in the footnote of cash flow statement receives higher market recognition than that in development expenditures,which can be used for earnings management,but less than that in the directors' report.The findings of this paper have important implications on the practice of R&D disclosure of listed companies and on future empirical research on R&D spending.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?