Subjective evaluation of life events associated with the self-rated health in military personnel in high altitude area
Mei-chu Shi,Zhong-we Ren,Ya-ning Xie,Jing-bo Zhao,Deng-fu Liang,Hong-bo Li,Hua Luo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1673-8225.2006.38.012
2006-01-01
Abstract:Aim: To investigate the subjective evaluation on life events and explore its relationship with the self-rated health in military personnel in high altitude area. Methods: With random cluster sampling, 490 male soldiers in high altitude area were selected from July to August 2004 and assessed with Life Event Scale and Self-rated Health Measurement Scale. The Self-rated Health Measurement Scale was complicated by Xu Jun, which consisted of 10 dimensions, 48 items including physiological, psychological and social subscales. Life Event Scale was composed of 26 items, each item was classified from without effect to severe effect, and 5-grading system (0-4 grade) was adopted. After factor analysis, the adaptive events, interrelationship events, emergent events, and events from work and environment were selected. The high mean scores in the life event scale indicated the great effects of the life events. All the subjects completed the test independently. The scores of adaptive events, interrelationship events, emergent events, and events from work and environment and the total mean scores in the life event scale were recorded. The subjects were grouped according to different subjective evaluations: The degree of the effect of life event on mind (mild, moderate and severe). The total scores of self-rated health scale and the scores of the three subscales of the soldiers with different subjective evaluations were compared and the correlation between subjective evaluation on life events and self-rated health was analyzed. Results: Totally 490 questionnaires were sent out and 485 qualified ones were retrieved with the efficient rate of 99.0%. (1) The main factors influencing military personnel were adaptive events, interrelationship events, and events from work and environment (1.32±0.72), (1.07±0.86), (1.02±0.73) scores. (2) There were significant differences in the scores of the subscales of self-rated health and the total scores among the three groups with different evaluation on events influence [Physiological health: (7.00±1.40), (5.85±1.43), (5.52±1.28), F=42.610, P=0.000; Social health: (7.00±1.39), (6.63±1.40), (6.53±1.88), F=9.288, P=0.000; Total scores: (7.44±1.00), (6.71±1.00), (6.57±0.93), F=32.728, P=0.000]. (3) The scores of perceived life events were significantly negatively correlated with the scores of three subscales and total scores of the self-rated health in military personnel in high altitude area (r=-0.235 to -0.445, P < 0.01). Conclusion: The adaptive events, interrelationship events, and events from work and environment have great influence upon the military personnel in high altitude area; the subjective evaluation on life events of the soldiers significantly influence the self-rated health, and we can improve their health level through transforming their cognition.