Abstract:Although debate was proven as a meaningful activity to practice college students' critical thinking skills, the traditional face-to-face debate carried out in physical classroom has some obvious shortcomings. Only a few students could be selected as debaters, while most audiences have no opportunity to express their thoughts about debate topics. In this study, a novel form of debate was used to encourage all students in a class to participate in debate, which allows both debaters and audiences to engage in debate with the support of an online discussion board. Students' depth of critical thinking was supposed to be closely related to their practice. The study aimed to explore debaters and audiences' depth of critical thinking and its relationship with their number of speeches/online posts in an undergraduate course. Newman's critical thinking analysis framework was used as an analysis tool. Results indicated that: (1) averagely speaking, the winning team demonstrated a higher depth of critical thinking, and their number of speeches was relatively more than that of the teams with lower debate scores; (2) debaters' depth of critical thinking was negatively correlated to their number of speeches; (3) audiences' depth of critical thinking was not significantly correlated to their number of online posts; (4) debaters' overall depth of critical thinking was relatively lower than that of audiences. Based on the findings, suggestions were put forward. More studies are encouraged to be carried out in more courses from diverse disciplines and with different sizes or different forms (face-to-face, blended or online). Instructors may redesign course assessment criteria and utilize incentive measures to encourage both debaters and audiences to express their viewpoints more frequently. Class observers may be arranged to make a record about the quality of debaters' speeches. Further studies may explore debaters' depth of critical thinking in preparing phases. More studies could be carried out to explore the online asynchronous debate.

Impact of body language on the image dissemination of politician:Case study on TV debate of 2012 political leader election in Taiwan

Exploring Debaters and Audiences' Depth of Critical Thinking and Its Relationship with Their Participation in Debate Activities

Mediating Effect of Political Involvement Model on the Impact of Televised Presidential Debate:Based on the analysis of Taiwan and Mainland College Students Watching the 2012 Taiwan Presidential Debate

Embodying Similarity and Difference: The Effect of Listing and Contrasting Gestures During U.S. Political Speech

Examining the Perceptual Gap and Behavioral Intention in the Perceived Effects of Polling News in the 2008 Taiwan Presidential Election

Gender, Candidate Emotional Expression, and Voter Reactions During Televised Debates

Influence of Face and Body on Recognition of Intense Emotion in Western

Mimicry Is Presidential: Linguistic Style Matching in Presidential Debates and Improved Polling Numbers

Need for Orientation and Third-Person Effects of the Televised Debates in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election

Analyzing image-based political propaganda in referendum campaigns: from elements to strategies

Social Media Would Not Lie: Prediction of the 2016 Taiwan Election via Online Heterogeneous Data

Contemporary International Media Environment and China's Image Communication

The 2024 Taiwanese Presidential Election on social media: Identity, policy, and affective virality

The impact of moral framing in the 2016 U.S. presidential debates on moral judgments and self-transcendent emotions in tweets

A Multimodal Predictive Model of Successful Debaters or How I Learned to Sway Votes

Ambivalent Versus Univalent Voters: Perceived Media Influences and Third-Person Perceptions

LLM-POTUS Score: A Framework of Analyzing Presidential Debates with Large Language Models

Is bad news on TV tickers good news? The effects of voiceover and visual elements in video on viewers' assessment

Observation or Insight? Unraveling the Impact of Characters' Image on Interpersonal Communication in Contemporary Chinese TV Series

Positive self-evaluation versus negative other-evaluation in the political genre of pre-election debates

The Power of Smiling. How Politicians’ Displays of Happiness Affect Viewers’ Gaze Behavior and Political Judgments