Abstract:Historically, change detection reviews have examined and categorized algorithms based on their techniques for the remote sensing community. Here, we synthesize urban land change algorithms by the types of information they provide to a diverse and growing set of user communities. Two goals of the paper are first to synthesize past and current change detection studies to examine urban land change to help users of remote sensing algorithms understand and navigate the vast variety of available methods, and second to identify gaps in knowledge for the urban remote sensing community. We analyzed 644 peer-reviewed research papers published in English-language journals and conducted a systematic review of urban land change algorithms. All papers included in our study focus on urban land change; studies that concentrate on single-date urban classification or mapping for one point in time without an explicit urban land change component are not included in this analysis. The review showed five key results and knowledge gaps. First, most urban change detection algorithms are being developed and applied for only a few regions, with 75% of studies focused on high or upper-middle-income countries and the majority of these on China or the United States. This suggests a major gap in geographic coverage as well as the need for more studies on cities in low and lower-middle-income countries. Second, the results show that 41% of the algorithms have been developed or applied for cities of over 5 million inhabitants. This focus on large cities is problematic given that only 11% of the world's urban population lives in cities with populations greater than 5 million and that most future urban growth will occur in small- and medium-sized towns and cities with populations of fewer than 1 million people. Third, our analysis shows that 62% of the studies use three or fewer time points to measure urban land change with an average study length of 17 years. Since rapidly growing urban areas are highly dynamic, this suggests that existing algorithms using only a few time points are likely missing urban transitions that can only be captured with high temporal frequency analysis. Fourth, we find that urban expansion is the most commonly monitored type of urban land change. Comparatively fewer studies characterized intra-urban change or three-dimensional structural change. Fifth and finally, the results show that an overwhelming majority—87%—of all studies identify only one urban class, highlighting a need for more studies that distinguish intra-urban variation and differentiate multiple urban classes. Our analysis shows that it is very difficult—nearly impossible—to compare across algorithms. Thus, for users of urban land change information, it is difficult to navigate the literature and know which algorithms are most appropriate for a particular use. Taken together, this points to the need for improved reproducibility, replicability, and comparability of studies in order to help harmonize urban land change information across regions and countries. This is especially important given the growing user communities of urban land change products and analysis, especially from policy and practice.

Algorithms And Applications For Land Cover Classification - A Review

Analysis technology for land remote sensing

Analysis and Applications of GlobeLand30: A Review

Geospatial Technology for Earth Observation

Land cover classification in an era of big and open data: Optimizing localized implementation and training data selection to improve mapping outcomes

Deep Learning Methods for Land Cover and Land Use Classification in Remote Sensing: A Review

Addressing the Need for Improved Land Cover Map Products for Policy Support

Finer-Resolution Mapping of Global Land Cover: Recent Developments, Consistency Analysis, and Prospects

Mapping The Land Cover Of Africa At 10 M Resolution From Multi-Source Remote Sensing Data With Google Earth Engine

Global Land Cover Mapping at 30 M Resolution: A POK-based Operational Approach

Geospatial Knowledge-Based Verification and Improvement of GlobeLand30

A review of supervised object-based land-cover image classification

Concepts and Key Techniques for 30 m Global Land Cover Mapping

The Standardization and Harmonization of Land Cover Classification Systems Towards Harmonized Datasets: A Review

Sentinel-2 Data for Land Use/Land Cover Mapping: A Meta-analysis and Review

Dimensionality Reduction and Feature Selection for Object-Based Land Cover Classification based on Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 Time Series Using Google Earth Engine

Training data in satellite image classification for land cover mapping: a review

Urban land cover classification using airborne LiDAR data: A review

A systematic review and assessment of algorithms to detect, characterize, and monitor urban land change

Remote Sensing Image Classification: A survey of support-vector-machine-based advanced techniques

SPATIAL DATA QUALITY EVALUATION FOR LAND COVER CLASSIFICATION APPROACHES