Abstract:In a series of papers Holmstrom, Milgrom and Roberts have argued that incentives for agents tend to be complementary under certain conditions. A growing body of empirical literature also appears to support this notion. Data constraints, however, have limited the studies to some particular industries or to a selective few aspects in agency contracts. This paper examines the complementarity and substitutability of CEO incentives of more than 300 Chinese state-owned enterprises from a panel data set. The data contain rich information about CEO pay sensitivity; whether the CEO posted performance bond; managerial discretion in production, in employee wage discretion, share of output to sell to the market (versus being required to deliver to the state at lower price); and contract duration. In explaining the interaction of incentives, we extend the framework of Holmstrom and Milgrom (1994) to accommodate the case of multiple signals for the manager's effort for each task. We classify the various incentive instruments into three tasks of CEOs: to pursue current financial performance, to invest for future financial performance, and to work on other activities that yield private benefits. The model then suggests that these three incentive indices should be complementary, and the individual incentives within an incentive index should be substitutes. Our empirical examination confirms these predictions. A side product of getting the conditional correlations is to be able to examine the determinants of the three incentive indices. We find that the determination of CEO incentives for current performance is consistent with the risk-incentive tradeoff hypothesis. The determination of managerial discretion is consistent with the incomplete contract literature that control rights should be matched with the party with superior information and ability. There is also evidence that the government uses contract duration to elicit information.

Redundancy Burden and Executive Incentive of State-owned Enterprises

Management Buyouts with Distorted Motivation:A New Explanation to SOEs' Performance Deterioration

Overemployment, Executive Pay-for-performance Sensitivity and Economic Consequences: Evidence from China

Corporate Endowment Insurance Fee Reduction and Employee Wages:Evidence from China

Compensation regulation and political promotion of executives of state-owned enterprises——Quasi-natural experiment based on the reform of compensation regulation in China

Could Executive Compensation Incentive Enhance the Efficiency of Enterprise Resource Allocation? An Empirical Study from China

AUTONOMY AND INCENTIVES IN CHINESE STATE ENTERPRISES

The Effect of Executive Compensation Regulation:A Study Based on Market Reactions of Competitive and Monopolistic SOEs

Is Top Management Compensation Incentive Excessive? Based on Marginal Diminishing Effects and Chinese Private Listed Companies

Subnational Institutional Contingencies and Executive Pay Dispersion

Do the policy burdens of state-owned enterprises affect the efficiency of resource allocation of tax incentives?

Can Mixed-Ownership Reform of State-Owned Enterprises Restrain Excessive Perquisite Consumption by Executives?

Complementarity and Substitutability of CEO Incentives: Theory and Evidence from Chinese State-Owned Enterprises

Executive Compensation of SOEs and Corporate Social Responsibility: Theory and Evidence from China

Excessive Incentive and Corporate Performance: Research Based on Marginal Diminishing Effect and Top Management Team of Chinese Listed Companies

A Study on the Compensation Gap among Executives at Chinese Enterprises*

Political Connections, Compensation Incentive,and Employee Allocation Efficiency

Executive Compensation, Firm Performance, and State Ownership in China: Evidence from New Panel Data*

Redundancies in Chinese State Enterprises: A Research Report

Policy Burden of State-Owned Enterprises and Efficiency of Credit Resource Allocation: Evidence from China