Effect of Effect-Increasing Loci in Predicting Milling Quality Traits of Indica Rice and It's Relation to the Genetic Effects

卢瑶,凌英华,杨正林,赵芳明,桑贤春,查仁明,何光华

2009-01-01

Abstract:In order to analyze the prediction effect hybrid performance of milling quality traits of indica rice by molecular markers especially effect-increasing loci(ILs),and to analyze the relation between the prediction effect and the genetic effects of brown rice percentage(BRP), milled rice percentage(MRP) and head rice percentage(HRP),polymorphism of 174 SSR and 31 AFLP markers for 32 parents were screened.By loci-screening performance of 3 F_2 milling quality traits,using different parents of two half-diallel sets(NCII design) under two environments (Chongqing and Luzhou),positive loci(PLs) and effect-increasing loci(ILs) were first obtained. Based on this,the mathematic models for prediction of hybrid performance by molecular markers were set up by the stepwise regression analysis.In the meanwhile,by using genetic model including genotype×environment(GE) interaction effects for quality traits of endosperms in cereal crops,the genetic effects of 3 milling quality traits in different environments were analyzed.Results indicated as follows:(1) the prediction effect of IL-prediction models(ILMs) was better than that of PL-prediction models(PLMs).ILMs are highly precise,strongly robust and have the certain practical value.R~2 of ILMs of BRP,MRP and HRP were 0.6467,0.6516 and 0.7265,respectively;That of PLMs were 0.4053,0.4981 and 0.6897.The residual errors of ILMs of BRP,MRP and HRP,were 0.8104,0.8011 and 4.4508,respectively;That of PLMs were 0.9826,0.9673 and 6.2676.CV%ILMs of BRP,MRP and HRP,were 6.7respectively;That of PLMs were 9.12%,8.13%and 6.09%.(2) The prediction effect of ILMs was different for different parents and traits.The prediction effect in same s(?)t of combination was better than that of between 2 sets of combination;The prediction effect of same sterile lines was better than that of same restorers lines;The prediction effect of HRP was better than that of MRP And BRP,respectively.(3) It was different that the prediction effects were influenced by GE interaction effects for different parents and milling quality traits. BRP was influenced by GE interaction effects was larger than MRP and HRP.Consequently, it may be more effective to set up prediction models with same sterile lines and same restorers lines under different environments,or to set up prediction models with the parental material less influenced by GE interaction effects.