Safety and Efficiency of ERCP in the Elderly Patients

毛志海,张卓,李健文,王明亮,陆爱国,胡伟国,蒋渝,郑民华
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-1954.2008.05.003
2008-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in elder and younger groups of patients. Methods Three hundred and one patients who underwent ERCP between Jan. 2006 and Dec. 2007 were studied retrospectively. One hundred and two patients(33.9%) were 70 years of age or older (Elder group) and 199 patients(66.1%) were 69 years of age or younger (Younger group). Data about ASA degree, clinical and biochemical features, primary diseases, ERCP procedures, ERCP diagnosis, complications and length of hospital stay were recorded and compared between the two groups. Results Three hundred and one cases were undergone 313 ERCP procedures. Elder group had a higher ASA degree (P0.01) than Younger group. Compared with Younger group (14.1%), Elder group patients presented with more specific symptoms (30.4%) with jaundice and biliary tract infection while Younger group with more non-specific symptoms (P0.05). Laboratory findings were similar in both groups. Selective biliary cannulation was technically successful in 96.7% of both groups (96.1% vs 97.0%). Pre-cut papillotomy was performed in 12.7% of Elder group and 14.1% of Younger group. The overall successful rate of stone extraction was 94.6% (94.8% vs 94.4%). Choledocholithiasis was the most frequent diagnosis in both groups. Malignant aetiologies and duodenal peripapilla diverticulum were more frequent in Elder group. Post-procedural complications developed in 14(4.7%) patients. There were 5(4.9%) complications in Elder group. In contrast, 9(4.5%) of the Younger group developed a complication. Conclusion Diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP have similar outcomes and complications rate in both elder and younger patients. ERCP is effective and safe in elderly patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?