[Comparison of Three Staining Methods for Hepatitis B Virus].

Juan Du,Zhi-hui Han,Fei Pei,Jie Zheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1671-167x.2006.03.022
2006-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To compare the advantages and disadvantages of three staining methods of HBV.METHODS:Normal Liver tissue and HBV-infected, HCV-infected, or dually infected (HBV and HCV) liver tissues were selected for this study. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections (4 microm) were prepared. Each of the liver tissue specimens was detected by three staining methods, including immunohistochemical methods, Shikata's orcein stain and Victoria blue stain,respectively.RESULTS:In the three methods, all of six HBV-infected cases showed intense staining, and three cases with dual infection (HBV and HCV) were weakly positive. However, both normal and HCV-infected liver tissues showed no staining. HBsAg stained dark brown with Immunohistochemical stain; HBsAg containing ground-glass hepatocytes stained magenta with Shikata's orcein stain; HBsAg stained blue with Victoria blue.CONCLUSION:Each of three methods has its own advantages and disadvantages: high specificity and sensitivity, but high cost for immunohistochemical methods; complicated and overelaborate procedure for preparation of solutions, lower specificity and sensitivity, but low cost, for special staining methods.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?