Synthesis and Catalytic Isoprene Polymerization of Rare-Earth Alkyl Complexes Supported by an Arylimine-amidinate Ligand

Gao Dongjing,Hu Hongfan,Cui Chunming
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6023/a13040433
2013-01-01
Abstract:Reaction of the arylimine-amidinate ligand [NNN]H (1) (NNN)=[2-C(H)NDippC(6)H(3)NHC(Ph)NDipp], Dipp=2,6-i-Pr2C6H3) with Ln(CH2SiMe3)(3)(THF)(2) (Ln=Y, Sm) in n-hexane at -78 degrees C followed by stirring the mixture for 3 h at room temperature afforded [NNN]Ln(CH2SiMe3)(2) (Ln=Y, 2; Ln=Sm, 3) in 75% and 50% yields after work up. 2 and 3 have been characterized by H-1 NMR, C-13 NMR, IR spectroscopy, elemental analysis. The molecular structure of 2 has been confirmed by X-ray analysis. Complexes 2 and 3 catalyzed the polymerization of isoprene in the presence of [Ph3C][B(C6F5)(4)] (1 equiv.) and AlEt3 (10 equiv.) at 25 degrees C. 2 converted 250 equivalents of isoprene into polyisoprene with a narrow molecular weight distribution (M-w/M-n=1.20) and a 3,4-rich microstructure (3,4-selectivity: 78%, rr=50%) in 12 h. A significant increase of 3,4-selectivity was observed in the presence of one equivalent of AlEt3 (3,4-selectivity: 87%). When i-Bu2AlH (10 equiv.) was used instead of AlEt3, the catalytic activity and selectivity did not change noticeably while the resulting polyisoprenes feature a broad molecular weight distribution (M-w/M-n=2.45). When the amounts of i-Bu2AlH decreased from 5 to 1 equivalent, a significant increase of 3,4-selectivity and number-average molecular weight have been observed while the molecular distributions became small. The catalyst is active within a wide range of temperatures from low temperature to 40 degrees C. At 40 degrees C, a similar selectivity (3,4-selectivity: 78%, M-w/M-n=1.43) to that found at 25 degrees C but the increased reaction rate has been observed. High stereo-and regioselectivity and narrow molecular weight distributions were obtained at -20 degrees C (3,4-selectivity: 88%, rr=52%, M-w/M-n=1.15). The samarium alkyl 3 exhibited a high activity but low selectivity (25 degrees C, 3 h, 3,4-selectivity: 67%, M-w/M-n=1.71) compared to the yttrium alkyl 2.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?