The Scientificity of the Concept of IP: Inquiry on the Nature of Subject Matter of Rights

Xiong Wencong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-0476.2013.07.002

2013-01-01

Abstract:Attributing to lacking the connotation of subject matters, critics hold that intellectual property is not a clear legal concept. Subject matter is the criteria to distinguishing the rights in rem. Differing from real right and moral right, there are many theories about the nature of the subject matter of IP, such as intangible property theory, intellectual work theory, information theory, knowledge theory and sign theory. Are these theories scientific and self-consistent? Are there any commonality linking up these theories? It should be answered through detailed logical reasoning and clear philosophic inquiry. Depending on the rationales and methods of information theory, linguistics and communications, it can concluded that difference is the nature of the subject matter of IP and characterizes incorporeality, duplicability and uncertainty on its meaning and boundary. These features give rise to some special concepts and rules in IP laws, but they are not the basis judging the legitimacy of IP. Making distinction between fact issue and value issue will be helpful to find the key point of settlement.