MOR As a Platform for Scholarly Conversations on Chinese Management Research
Anne S. Tsui,Yanjie Bian,John Child,Joseph Galaskiewicz,Yadong Luo,Marshall W. Meyer,Michael Morris
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2005.0018a.x
IF: 3.776
2005-01-01
Management and Organization Review
Abstract:In this third issue of Management and Organization Review (MOR) we are pleased to present five excellent papers. Three are about firms within the Chinese context and two are on issues that transcend national boundaries. Also, three of these papers are at the firm level of analysis and two at the individual level. The first paper by Michael A. Hitt, Haiyang Li, and William J. Worthington IV focuses on the learning behaviors of both local firms and foreign entrants in emerging markets. The authors theorize the type of learning — exploitative or exploratory that would be pursued by each type of firm. The difference occurs not only in the types of learning pursued and in the learning processes, but also depends on the level of maturity of the emerging markets. The propositions offered by the authors can guide future research on organizational learning by firms in China as well as in other emerging markets. This issue has two papers on the globalization of Chinese firms. John Child and Suzana B. Rodrigues examine the patterns and motivation of internationalization by mainland Chinese firms. Using several cases, they identify that Chinese firms pursue first 'inward' internationalization (e.g., original equipment manufacturer (OEM) and joint venture partnerships) before engaging 'outward' internationalization (e.g., acquisition and organic expansion abroad). The authors contend that the Chinese case offers an opportunity to extend present theorizing in internationalization on a number of dimensions. Carolyn Erdener and Daniel M. Shapiro, in contrast, focus on the Chinese family enterprises in Southeast Asia. These firms amass a large portion of that region's corporate wealth. Through the lens of Dunning's eclectic paradigm of Ownership, Location and Internalization (OLI), they trace the role of cultural and economic factors in the success of internationalization of these family-owned and largely familymanaged firms. As do Child and Rodrigues, who suggest the need to expand the scope of the received theory, which originated from the analysis of Western multinational corporations, to include Chinese as well as other non-western organizational forms. We echo the voice of these authors that pushing the boundaries of