Abstract:The object of copyright is a kind of quasipublic goods which is non-excludable and non-rival in consumption. For the purpose of making the best use of everything, qualified people and organizations are entitled to obtain statutory licenses to retransmit owners' works or distribute copies under the conditions specified by the law. The statutory licensing system in the American law is based on three principles: anti-monopolism, fair market price in negotiated terms, and maximizing the availability of creative works to the public. It affords the copyright owners fair protection to make owners' identification clear, obtain licensing fee distribution, and prohibit willful altering of the content of particular works or any commercial advertising or station announcement transmitted by the primary transmitter during, or immediately before or after, the transmission of such program. It endows copyright users with the right of secondary transmission and fair incomes under the existing economic conditions. Both sides have the obligation to cooperate with each other for their exertion of right and acquisition of evidence in substantial law and procedural law. Neglect violation is actionable as acts of infringement and fully subject to remedies provided by the law. Notwithstanding any provision of the antitrust laws, in negotiating statutory licenses in accordance with copyright law, any copyright owners and users may negotiate and agree upon the royalty rates and license terms and conditions for the performance. In the absence of negotiated license agreement, and upon the filing of a petition, a copyright arbitration royalty panel is to determine and establish such rates and terms, considering these for comparable types of performance and circumstances under the voluntary license negotiated under market conditions. Any decision of the agency should be under judicial reviews when it is appealed by aggrieved party who would be bound by it. In the absence of the systematization of statutory licensing proceedings in the American law, China has much to do to absorb all the forenamed theories and practices. Acquiescence licensing is characteristic of the Chinese system and shows its strongpoints, which may be reserved under particular conditions.

Research on the Licensing Model of Government Information Resource Reuse in Foreign Countries

Analysis of the online periodical copyright mass licensing model SWOT

Analysis on Market-Oriented Model of Government Business Information Resources Access and Utilization

The Investigation on the China’s Public Sectors on Re-Use of Public Sector Information and Its Countermeasures

Technology Licensing in China

On the Mechanism and Behavior of Patent Licensing of Foreign Firms

Comparative Analysis of Works' Statutory Licensing Systems in Chinese and American Laws

The Copyright Licensing Mode in the Cyber-Space in China

Reconsideration on parallel imports of intellectual property rights licensing and legislative revelation to China

Research on Strategic Delegation and the Licensing of Patented Technology under Auction Mechanism

Study on Compulsory License of Intellectual Property Rights Licensing

UK Waste Management Licensing System and Its Inspiration to China

Research on the System of Implied License for Copyright

Location of Function and Investigation on Attitudes of End User on Re-use of Public Sector Information

Comparative Researches on Sustainable Development of Foreign Information Resource Sharing Organizations

Strategies and Implementations of Government Information Charging

Research on Government Information Sharing Model Using Blockchain Technology

An Analysis of Network Information Management Mechanisms in Singapore

Analysis of Government Organs Reply on Open Health Administrative License Information Being Made Known to the Public upon Applications in Shanghai

Subject and Object of Public Access to Information Resources

Technology Gap, Market Experience and Mncs' Technology Licensing Strategies: Evidence from China