Abstract:This two-part article explores the question of how to constitute China in the twentieth century as an object of thought. This means, first of all, releasing the twentieth century from the position of being a mere object, such that one no longer regards this era as an annotation or appendage to contemporary value systems and ideologies, but instead approaches it as a process in which, passing through the liberation of the object, we may reconstruct a relation of dialogue between ourselves and twentieth-century China. Part 1 proceeds from a temporal analysis of the twentieth century, and Part 2 analyzes this era from a spatial perspective. Part 1 encompasses three sections: first, the long twentieth century, the European fin de siècle, and the century as a trend of the times; second, the conditions of the short century, imperialism, and the rise of the Pacific century; third, the Chinese Revolution and the rise of the short century: unevenness and “the weakest link.” Having pursued an analysis of the global conditions of the imperialist epoch, I assert that any discussion of the birth of the “short twentieth century” must begin with an analysis of “the weakest link.” In seeking the roots of the revolutionary moment, one must look not at the geopolitical contestations in Eurasia, but instead the revolutionary conditions produced by the new situation in Asia (especially the rise of Japan and Japan’s victory over Russia). That is, it was not imperialist wars pure and simple, but instead the “awakening of Asia” called into being by these wars that constituted the multifaceted point of departure for the “short twentieth century.” Thus, from the perspective of temporality, the “short twentieth century” did not, as is often believed, begin in 1914, but rather in the period 1905–1911; from the perspective of spatiality, it did not begin at a single point of beginning, but from a whole series of points of beginning; from the perspective of the moment, it did not begin through destructive wars, but instead was born in a series of attempts to break free of the imperialist system and the archaic regime.

Chinese and Japanese Elites'Cognition of World Order in Mid-nineteenth Century

Abolition of the Imperial Examination System and Conflict of Civilizations

American Concept of World Order and the Evolution of East-Asian International System (1900-1945) (I)

On China's Lack of Theories Regarding its Participation in the Construction of International Organizations

The Duet of National Salvation and Enlightenment Movement

The Final Splendour Of An Aged Empire: Chinese Thought On International Law In The Early Twentieth Century

The Burden of"Concert of Great Powers"and the Remaking of Modern China

Chinese Education in the Visions of Foreigners in the Late Qing Dynasty

On the Change of Chinese Intellectuals; Diplomatic Stand to Japan around Anti-Japanese War: With a Focus on China Institute of Pacific Relations

The European Perspective on China: A Historical Retrospection

Inception: from Hundred Days Reform to Xinhai Revolution

The Transition Between the Old and the New Chinese Ideas of History in the 19th Century

China and the Future International Order(s)

Cultural Differences between China and Japan and Their Modernization Processes

The Western Learning into the East and the Cultural Changes of the Qing Dynasty

China'S Role In A World Of Epochal Changes

The Formation of a New Confucianism in the 40s of the XX Century in the Framework of the Discussion of "Westernizers" and Post-Confucians

China's New Foreign Policy: Not Conflict but Convergence of Interests

China’s long march to national rejuvenation: toward a Neo-Imperial order in East Asia?

The Evolution of Political Thought in Japan and Its Impact on Sino-Japanese Relations

Twentieth-Century China as an Object of Thought: An Introduction, Part 1 The Birth of the Century: The Chinese Revolution and the Logic of Politics