Pseudoscalar production at ωω threshold in J/ψ→γωω

M. Ablikim,J. Bai,Y. Ban,J. Bian,X. Cai,H. Chen,J. Chen,Jin Chen,Y. Chen,S. Chi,Y. Chu,X. Cui,Y. Dai,L. Diao,Z. Deng,Q. Dong,S. Du,J. Fang,S. Fang,C. Fu,C. Gao,Y. Gao,S. Gu,Y. Gu,Y. Guo,Z. Guo,F. Harris,K. He,M. He,Y. Heng,H. Hu,T. Hu,G. Huang,X. Huang,X. Ji,X. Jiang,J. Jiao,D. Jin,S. Jin,Yi Jin,Y. Lai,G. Li,H. Li,J. Li,R. Li,S. Li,W. Li,X. Li,Y. Li,Y. Liang,H. Liao,B. Liu,C. Liu,F. Liu,Fang Liu,H. Liu,J. Liu,Q. Liu,R. Liu,Z. Liu,Y. Lou,F. Lu,G. Lu,J. Lu,C. Luo,F. Ma,H. Ma,L. Ma,Q. Ma,X. Ma,Z. Mao,X. Mo,J. Nie,S. Olsen,H. Peng,R. Ping,N. Qi,H. Qin,J. Qiu,Z. Ren,G. Rong,L. Shan,L. Shang,C. Shen,D. Shen,X. Shen,H. Sheng,H. Sun,J. Sun,S. Sun,Y. Sun,Z. Sun,Z. Tan,X. Tang,G. Tong,G. Varner,D. Wang,L. Wang,M. Wang,P. Wang,W. Wang,Y. Wang,Z. Wang,Zhe Wang,Zheng Wang,C. Wei,D. Wei,N. Wu,X. Xia,X. Xie,G. Xu,X. Xu,Y. Xu,M. Yan,H. Yang,Y. Yang,M. Ye,Y. Ye,Z. Yi,G. Yu,C. Yuan,J. Yuan,Y. Yuan,S. Zang,Y. Zeng,Yu Zeng,B. Zhang,C. Zhang,D. Zhang,H. Zhang,J. Zhang,S. Zhang,X. Zhang,Yiyun Zhang,Z. Zhang,D. Zhao,J. Zhao,M. Zhao,P. Zhao,W. Zhao,Z. Zhao,H. Zheng,J. Zheng,Z. Zheng,L. Zhou,N. Zhou,K. Zhu,Q. Zhu,Y. Zhu,Yingchun Zhu,Z. Zhu,B. Zhuang,X. Zhuang,B. Zou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.73.112007
IF: 5.407
2006-01-01
Physical Review D
Abstract:The decay channel J/psi ->gamma omega omega, omega ->pi(+)pi(-)pi(0) is analyzed using a sample of 5.8x10(7) J/psi events collected with the BESII detector. The omega omega invariant mass distribution peaks at 1.76 GeV/c(2), just above the omega omega threshold. Analysis of angular correlations indicates that the omega omega system below 2 GeV/c(2) is predominantly pseudoscalar. A partial wave analysis confirms the predominant pseudoscalar structure, together with small 0(++) and 2(++) contributions, and yields a pseudoscalar mass M=1744 +/- 10 (stat)+/- 15 (syst) MeV/c(2), a width Gamma=244(-21)(+24) (stat)+/- 25 (syst) MeV/c(2), and a product branching fraction Br(J/psi ->gamma eta(1760))center dot Br(eta(1760)->omega omega)=(1.98 +/- 0.08 (stat)+/- 0.32 (syst))x10(-3).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?