Abstract:Project 211 is one of the most important educational policies in China, which aims at selecting a small number of “key universities” for sustainable development in the 21st century. These selected “key universities” have received substantial funding from the government so they can recruit outstanding faculty and be equipped with high quality facilities. Although this national policy has come into being for more than a decade, limited empirical studies have been conducted to examine how the policy influences students’ performance as well as whether the policy is perceived to interfere with test fairness. Using differential item analysis (DIF) and content analysis, this study examined the effect of group membership (key vs. non-key universities) on one of the large-scale high-stakes language tests–the Graduate School Entrance English Examination (GSEEE). The results identified a number of DIF/DBF, all favoring test takers from key universities. A review of the flagged items by three test reviewers found a myriad of potential factors including unbalanced learning opportunities, which may contribute to performance differences between two groups. However, none of the reviewers deemed that unbalanced educational opportunities brought bias and presented a threat to fairness. Fairness in this context is conceptualized to require individuals or groups who are less well-off to sacrifice social benefits and resources to those who are better off to achieve the overarching aim of maximizing economic benefit to the society.

School Choice in England:Progress and Problems

Probing into Market Force in the Educational Reform——A Review of ‘The Choice between Equity and Efficiency:Study on the Educational Market-oriented Reform in the USA’

School Choice in China: Past, Present, and Future

A Review on the New Education Policies for Entrepreneurship Education at Colleges and Universities in UK

A Motivation Perspective on College Admission Reform in Shanghai: The Effect of Providing More Choices and Multiple Evaluation Criteria

A Probe into the Reform on Financial Support Institution for Students in Higher Institutes in the UK

School Choice in Chinese Urban Compulsory Education and Its Impact on Disadvantaged Groups

Parents’ experiences of choosing a special school for their children

History,Practice and Evaluation of the UK Education Accountability System

Exit and voice: A case study of the effect of the policy of rotating teachers and principals on the decision of parents to engage in school choice

Three-restriction Policy and Public High School Choice

School Choice in the United States:Evaluation from Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching

Do Academically Selective School Systems Strengthen the Link Between Students’ Family Backgrounds and the Likelihood of Higher Education Participation?

The Effect of a National Education Policy on Language Test Performance: a Fairness Perspective

Comparing the Secondary Education in UK with the High School Education in China

Analysis of the Differences between the Chinese and British General High School Education Systems

The governors of school markets? Local education authorities, school choice and equity in Finland and Sweden

Analysis of Migrant Children’s Parents’"School Choice"Behavior in the Background of the"Two Main"Policy: An Investigation in Beijing

How Do Academic Selection Systems Affect Pupils' Educational Attainment? New Evidence from an Analysis of Large-Scale Data on England

Chinese College Admissions and School Choice Reforms: A Theoretical Analysis

Chinese College Admissions and School Choice Reforms: an Experimental Study