Abstract:We study the approximability of two natural Boolean constraint satisfaction problems: Horn satisfiability and exact hitting set. Under the Unique Games conjecture, we prove the following optimal inapproximability and approximability results for finding an assignment satisfying as many constraints as possible given a near-satisfiable instance.1. Given an instance of Max Horn-3SAT that admits an assignment satisfying (1 - epsilon) of its constraints for some small constant epsilon > 0, it is hard to find an assignment satisfying more than (1 - 1/O(log(1/epsilon))) of the constraints. This matches a linear programming based algorithm due to Zwick [Zwi98], resolving the natural open question raised in that work concerning the optimality of the approximation bound.Given a (1 - epsilon) satisfiable instance of Max Horn-2SAT for some constant epsilon > 0, it is possible to find a (1 - 2 epsilon)-satisfying assignment efficiently. This improves the algorithm given in [KSTW00] which finds a (1 - 3 epsilon)-satisfying assignment, and also matches the (1 - c epsilon) hardness for any c < 2 derived from vertex cover (under UGC).2. An instance of Max 1-in-k-HS consists of a universe U and a collection C of subsets of U of size at most k, and the goal is to find a subset of U that intersects the maximum number of sets in C at a unique element. We prove that Max 1-in-k-HS is hard to approximate within a factor of O(1/log k) for every fixed integer k. This matches (up to constant factors) an easy factor O(1/log k) approximation algorithm for the problem, and resolves a question posed in [GT05].It is crucial for the above hardness that sets of size up to k are allowed; indeed, when all sets have size k, there is a simple factor 1/e-approximation algorithm.Our hardness results are proved by constructing integrality gap instances for a semidefinite programming relaxation for the problems, and using Raghavendra's result [Rag08] to conclude that no algorithm can do better than the SDP assuming the UGC. In contrast to previous gap constructions where the instances had a good SDP solution by design and the main task was bounding the integral optimum, the challenge in our case is the construction of appropriate SDP vectors and the integral optimum is easy to bound. Our algorithmic results are based on rounding appropriate linear programming relaxations.

A Heuristic Complete Algorithm for SAT Problem by Approximation Solution

An Efficient Resolution Based Algorithm for SAT

Solving SAT Problem by Heuristic Polarity Decision-Making Algorithm

A survey of SAT solver

Solving SAT by Algorithm Transform of Wu’s Method

General Method for Solving Four Types of SAT Problems

A Modified DP Algorithm for Solving Hard SAT Problems

An SVM-Based Prediction Method for Solving SAT Problems

Solving SAT Problems by Orthogonal Method

Greedy Algorithms for the Maximum Satisfiability Problem: Simple Algorithms and Inapproximability Bounds

Implementing Efficient All Solutions SAT Solvers

Explaining SAT Solving Using Causal Reasoning

Tight Bounds On The Approximability Of Almost-Satisfiable Horn Sat And Exact Hitting Set

Further Explanations on "SAT Requires Exhaustive Search"

A Folding Strategy for SAT Solvers Based on Shannon's Expansion Theorem

AutoSAT: Automatically Optimize SAT Solvers via Large Language Models

Hybrid Sat Solver Considering Circuit Observability

EHSAT: an Efficient RTL Satisfiability Solver Using an Extended DPLL Procedure.

Integrating Advanced Reasoning into a SAT Solver.

SAT solving for variants of first-order subsumption

Finding Unsatisfiable Subformulas With Stochastic Method