Exposure of Facial Nerve in Tympanosclerosis and Cholesteatoma:A Retrospective Study

高伟,李晓媛,许敏,韩宇,陈阳,邱建华
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-2922.2012.04.011
2012-01-01
Abstract:Objective Retrospectively analyze surgically identified facial nerve exposure in tympanosclerosis and cholesteatoma, and discuss the mechanism and treatment of coexisting facial paralysis. Methods Cases of tympanosclerosis (n=14) or cholesteatoma (n=41) with confirmed facial nerve exposure during primary surgeries were compared for location of facial nerve exposure and coexisting facial paralysis. Results Facial nerve exposure in tympanosclerosis was almost always in the tympanic segment (12/14, 85.7%). Exposure was at the geniculate ganglion in 1 case (7.1%) and involved both the ge?niculate ganglion and tympanic segments in 1 case (7.1%). One of these cases showed facial paralysis before surgery, which fully recovered in 5 months following depression surgery. Facial paralysis was secondary to the surgery in 2 cases, with de?lay in 1 case. Both cases totally recovered after treatment. Facial nerve exposure in cholesteatoma was found in the tympan?ic segment in 28 cases (68.3%), in the mastoid segment in 6 cases (14.6%), at the geniculate ganglion in 1 case (2.4%), in?volving both mastoid and tympanic segments in 5 cases (12.2%) and both geniculate ganglion and tympanic segments in 1 case (2.4%). Facial paralysis was present before surgery in 4 cases (9.6%), which significantly improved after decompres?sion surgery. Facial paralysis was a surgical complilcation in 1 case (2.4%) , which recovered completely after conservative treatment. Although the exposure segments in the two groups were significantly different, the rates of preoperative and post?operative facial paralysis in the two groups were not significantly different. Conclusion Location of facial nerve exposure in cholesteatoma varies, depending on the extent of disease, whereas it presents mostly in the tympanic segment in tympano?sclerosis. Incidence of facial paralysis is not significantly different between the two groups.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?