Abstract:In XAI it is important to consider that, in contrast to explanations for professional audiences, one cannot assume common expertise when explaining for laypeople. But such explanations between humans vary greatly, making it difficult to research commonalities across explanations. We used the dual nature theory, a techno-philosophical approach, to cope with these challenges. According to it, one can explain, for example, an XAI's decision by addressing its dual nature: by focusing on the Architecture (e.g., the logic of its algorithms) or the Relevance (e.g., the severity of a decision, the implications of a recommendation). We investigated 20 game explanations using the theory as an analytical framework. We elaborate how we used the theory to quickly structure and compare explanations of technological artifacts. We supplemented results from analyzing the explanation contents with results from a video recall to explore how explainers justified their explanation. We found that explainers were focusing on the physical aspects of the game first (Architecture) and only later on aspects of the Relevance. Reasoning in the video recalls indicated that EX regarded the focus on the Architecture as important for structuring the explanation initially by explaining the basic components before focusing on more complex, intangible aspects. Shifting between addressing the two sides was justified by explanation goals, emerging misunderstandings, and the knowledge needs of the explainee. We discovered several commonalities that inspire future research questions which, if further generalizable, provide first ideas for the construction of synthetic explanations.

Exploration on Lipton's IBE

Inference to the Best Explanation in Large Language Models

Evaluating Explanation Without Ground Truth in Interpretable Machine Learning

Linking Model Intervention to Causal Interpretation in Model Explanation

KACE: Generating Knowledge-Aware Contrastive Explanations for Natural Language Inference

A Social-Pragmatic Approach to Some Novel Uses of BEI

Contrastive Explanation: A Structural-Model Approach

Sequential and Simultaneous Multiple Explanation: Implications for Alternative Consideration when Response Options Are Not Provided

CEBaB: Estimating the Causal Effects of Real-World Concepts on NLP Model Behavior

Explaining Explanations in AI

Evaluating everyday explanations

Consciousness and inference to the best explanation: Compiling empirical evidence supporting the access-phenomenal distinction and the overflow hypothesis

Scenarios and Approaches for Situated Natural Language Explanations

Explanation as a process: user-centric construction of multi-level and multi-modal explanations

Adding Why to What? Analyses of an Everyday Explanation

Evaluating Readability and Faithfulness of Concept-based Explanations

Verification and Refinement of Natural Language Explanations through LLM-Symbolic Theorem Proving

BEExAI: Benchmark to Evaluate Explainable AI

CausalBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Causal Learning Capability of LLMs

Good Explanations in Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Evidence from Human Explanatory Reasoning

Towards a Unified Framework for Evaluating Explanations